Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin Vs Amitriptyline in Patients of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Case of Diabetes Mellitus

Rajneet Kaur, V. Sehgal, Rps Sibia, A. Kaur, Avnish Kumar
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin Vs Amitriptyline in Patients of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Case of Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Rajneet Kaur, V. Sehgal, Rps Sibia, A. Kaur, Avnish Kumar","doi":"10.18311/IJMDS/2019/23424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diabetes mellitus frequently leads to development of peripheral neuropathies in almost 30-50% of patients and the most common type of neuropathy associated with this condition is Distal Symmetric Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy (DSPN). Gabapentin and Amitriptyline are two drugs frequently used for the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with type 2 diabetes. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Amitriptyline in subjects of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathic pain. Material and Methods: A prospective, open, randomized, parallel group, comparative study was conducted in 60 patients coming to Department of Medicine, Rajindra Hospital attached to Government Medical College Patiala, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Amitriptyline in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study after taking written informed consent. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 cases each by simple randomization. Group I patients received Gabapentin 300 mg HS by oral route. Group II patients received Amitriptyline 25 mg HS by oral route. Therapeutic efficacy of both drugs, by using Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) was compared at the baseline and at the end of 4 months. Any adverse drug reactions of the respective drug observed in patient were also noted. All the observations thus made were statistically analysed using appropriate tests. Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients in two groups such as age, sex, duration of diabetes were similar (p>0.05). The mean age in group I and group II were 53.40±8.41 years and 57.17±8.55 years, respectively. There was statistically significant reduction in mean MNSI scores in questionnaire part and physical examination part in both the groups. Also, there was statistically significant difference between the two drugs in reducing mean MNSI score. Mean difference between two drugs in reducing MNSI score in history part (0.77±0.16, p<0.01) and physical examination part (0.75±0.19, p<0.01) favoured Gabapentin. No. of adverse drug reactions reported were significantly higher in Amitriptyline group, p value (<0.05) for the difference in ADRs between two drugs was statistically significant. Conclusion: In this study, we concluded that both drugs lead to improvement in signs and symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Gabapentin was proved to be more efficacious than Amitriptyline. Gabapentin treated patient’s mean MNSI score at the study end point was significantly lower as compared to the Amitriptyline treated patient’s end-point score. Adverse drug reactions reported in our study were mild in both the groups and a significantly higher number of adverse effects were reported in the amitriptyline group. Dizziness and somnolence were two most commonly reported adverse drug reactions.","PeriodicalId":14010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2019/23424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus frequently leads to development of peripheral neuropathies in almost 30-50% of patients and the most common type of neuropathy associated with this condition is Distal Symmetric Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy (DSPN). Gabapentin and Amitriptyline are two drugs frequently used for the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with type 2 diabetes. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Amitriptyline in subjects of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathic pain. Material and Methods: A prospective, open, randomized, parallel group, comparative study was conducted in 60 patients coming to Department of Medicine, Rajindra Hospital attached to Government Medical College Patiala, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Amitriptyline in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study after taking written informed consent. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 cases each by simple randomization. Group I patients received Gabapentin 300 mg HS by oral route. Group II patients received Amitriptyline 25 mg HS by oral route. Therapeutic efficacy of both drugs, by using Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) was compared at the baseline and at the end of 4 months. Any adverse drug reactions of the respective drug observed in patient were also noted. All the observations thus made were statistically analysed using appropriate tests. Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients in two groups such as age, sex, duration of diabetes were similar (p>0.05). The mean age in group I and group II were 53.40±8.41 years and 57.17±8.55 years, respectively. There was statistically significant reduction in mean MNSI scores in questionnaire part and physical examination part in both the groups. Also, there was statistically significant difference between the two drugs in reducing mean MNSI score. Mean difference between two drugs in reducing MNSI score in history part (0.77±0.16, p<0.01) and physical examination part (0.75±0.19, p<0.01) favoured Gabapentin. No. of adverse drug reactions reported were significantly higher in Amitriptyline group, p value (<0.05) for the difference in ADRs between two drugs was statistically significant. Conclusion: In this study, we concluded that both drugs lead to improvement in signs and symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Gabapentin was proved to be more efficacious than Amitriptyline. Gabapentin treated patient’s mean MNSI score at the study end point was significantly lower as compared to the Amitriptyline treated patient’s end-point score. Adverse drug reactions reported in our study were mild in both the groups and a significantly higher number of adverse effects were reported in the amitriptyline group. Dizziness and somnolence were two most commonly reported adverse drug reactions.
加巴喷丁与阿米替林治疗糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性比较分析
导论:糖尿病经常导致周围神经病变的发展,在近30-50%的患者中,最常见的神经病变类型是远端对称感觉运动多神经病变(DSPN)。加巴喷丁和阿米替林是两种经常用于治疗2型糖尿病相关神经性疼痛的药物。研究目的:本研究的目的是比较加巴喷丁和阿米替林治疗伴有周围神经性疼痛的2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:采用前瞻性、开放、随机、平行组、对照研究的方法,对60例就诊于帕蒂拉政府医学院附属Rajindra医院内科的患者,评价加巴喷丁和阿米替林治疗糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性。符合纳入标准的患者在填写书面知情同意书后被纳入研究。采用简单随机法将患者分为两组,每组30例。第一组患者口服加巴喷丁300 mg HS。II组患者口服阿米替林25mg HS。采用密歇根神经病变筛查仪(MNSI)比较两种药物在基线和4个月结束时的疗效。还记录了在患者中观察到的相应药物的任何不良反应。用适当的检验对所有观察结果进行统计分析。结果:两组患者的年龄、性别、糖尿病病程等基线特征相似(p>0.05)。ⅰ组和ⅱ组患者平均年龄分别为53.40±8.41岁和57.17±8.55岁。两组患者问卷部分和体格检查部分的MNSI平均得分均有统计学意义的降低。两种药物在降低平均MNSI评分方面也有统计学差异。两种药物在降低病史部分MNSI评分(0.77±0.16,p<0.01)和体格检查部分MNSI评分(0.75±0.19,p<0.01)的平均差异以加巴喷丁为主。不。阿米替林组报告的不良反应发生率显著高于对照组,两种药物不良反应的p值(<0.05)差异有统计学意义。结论:在本研究中,我们得出结论,两种药物均可改善糖尿病神经病变的体征和症状。加巴喷丁被证明比阿米替林更有效。加巴喷丁治疗患者在研究终点的平均MNSI评分显著低于阿米替林治疗患者的终点评分。在我们的研究中,两组报告的药物不良反应都很轻微,阿米替林组报告的不良反应数量明显更高。头晕和嗜睡是两种最常见的药物不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信