{"title":"Explanatory models and psychiatric pluralism among family members of mentally Ill persons: a narrative inquiry","authors":"Bidisha Banerjee, S. Dixit","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1316753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Active involvement of families in mental health care in India is well documented. This study aimed to understand the explanatory models of the family members of persons suffering from common as well as severe mental illness. Narratives were collected through interviews from family members accompanying the patients at a psychiatric clinic. Data were also obtained from professionals at the clinic as well as folk healers. The Constant Comparative Method was used for analysis. The notable findings were: healthcare pluralism at institutional, cognitive and structural levels; conflicting explanatory models about mental illness; and stigma regarding mental illness. The findings suggest that in addition to explanatory models, the accessibility and availability of healers also plays a major role in treatment choices by the families.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"56 1","pages":"320 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1316753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
ABSTRACT Active involvement of families in mental health care in India is well documented. This study aimed to understand the explanatory models of the family members of persons suffering from common as well as severe mental illness. Narratives were collected through interviews from family members accompanying the patients at a psychiatric clinic. Data were also obtained from professionals at the clinic as well as folk healers. The Constant Comparative Method was used for analysis. The notable findings were: healthcare pluralism at institutional, cognitive and structural levels; conflicting explanatory models about mental illness; and stigma regarding mental illness. The findings suggest that in addition to explanatory models, the accessibility and availability of healers also plays a major role in treatment choices by the families.
期刊介绍:
This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.