The Quality of Accounting Information: Relevance or Value-Relevance?

Nasrin Azar, Z. Zakaria, Noor Adwa Sulaiman
{"title":"The Quality of Accounting Information: Relevance or Value-Relevance?","authors":"Nasrin Azar, Z. Zakaria, Noor Adwa Sulaiman","doi":"10.22452/AJAP.VOL12NO1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aim: This paper critically evaluates the qualitative characteristics of accounting information that can be drawn from the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB)/International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) Conceptual Framework and Value-Relevance studies that are motivated by users of accounting information. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach: This study reviews the value-relevance literature and Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) No. 8, which was issued by FASB in September 2010 in order to make a distinction between them. \nResearch findings: The value-relevance literature, which reported the associations between accounting numbers and common equity valuations, has limited implications or inferences for accounting information users. Although some scholars believe that the value relevance model indicates that accounting information is relevant and reliable (faithfully represented), it is, however, difficult to attribute the cause of the lack of value relevance to the relevance or the reliability aspects as the value relevance model does not distinguish between relevance and reliability. \nTheoretical contribution/Originality: This study provides some recommendations and a framework for future academic research related to the qualitative characteristics of accounting information (especially earnings) and value-relevance models. \nPractitioner/Policy implications: According to the conceptual framework defined by the FASB and IASB, relevance and faithful representation, as fundamental qualitative characteristics, are required for the provision of the usefulness of accounting information, and should be taken into consideration by scholars and standard setters in the accounting area. \nResearch limitation/Implication: This paper does not have a direct impact on practice. But, if the standard setters and researchers apply the concepts have been defined by this study in their accounting standards and their research, respectively, the results of those standards or research can be finally useful for the practice, especially for the investors. \nKeywords: Accounting Information, FASB/IASB Conceptual Framework, Value-Relevance, Relevance, Faithful Representation \nType of manuscripts: Literature review \nJEL Classification: M480","PeriodicalId":33532,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/AJAP.VOL12NO1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Research aim: This paper critically evaluates the qualitative characteristics of accounting information that can be drawn from the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB)/International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) Conceptual Framework and Value-Relevance studies that are motivated by users of accounting information. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study reviews the value-relevance literature and Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) No. 8, which was issued by FASB in September 2010 in order to make a distinction between them. Research findings: The value-relevance literature, which reported the associations between accounting numbers and common equity valuations, has limited implications or inferences for accounting information users. Although some scholars believe that the value relevance model indicates that accounting information is relevant and reliable (faithfully represented), it is, however, difficult to attribute the cause of the lack of value relevance to the relevance or the reliability aspects as the value relevance model does not distinguish between relevance and reliability. Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study provides some recommendations and a framework for future academic research related to the qualitative characteristics of accounting information (especially earnings) and value-relevance models. Practitioner/Policy implications: According to the conceptual framework defined by the FASB and IASB, relevance and faithful representation, as fundamental qualitative characteristics, are required for the provision of the usefulness of accounting information, and should be taken into consideration by scholars and standard setters in the accounting area. Research limitation/Implication: This paper does not have a direct impact on practice. But, if the standard setters and researchers apply the concepts have been defined by this study in their accounting standards and their research, respectively, the results of those standards or research can be finally useful for the practice, especially for the investors. Keywords: Accounting Information, FASB/IASB Conceptual Framework, Value-Relevance, Relevance, Faithful Representation Type of manuscripts: Literature review JEL Classification: M480
会计信息质量:相关性还是价值相关性?
研究目的:本文批判性地评估了会计信息的定性特征,这些特征可以从财务会计准则委员会(FASB)/国际会计准则委员会(IASB)概念框架和价值相关性研究中得出,这些研究是由会计信息使用者推动的。设计/方法/方法:本研究回顾了价值相关文献和FASB于2010年9月发布的财务会计概念说明书(SFAC)第8号,以便对它们进行区分。研究发现:价值相关文献报告了会计数字与普通股估值之间的关联,对会计信息使用者的影响或推论有限。虽然有学者认为价值关联模型表明会计信息具有相关性和可靠性(如实反映),但由于价值关联模型没有区分相关性和可靠性,因此很难将价值相关性缺失的原因归结为相关性或可靠性方面。理论贡献/独创性:本研究为未来与会计信息(尤其是盈余)和价值相关模型的定性特征相关的学术研究提供了一些建议和框架。从业者/政策影响:根据FASB和IASB定义的概念框架,相关性和忠实代表性作为提供会计信息有用性的基本定性特征,应被会计领域的学者和标准制定者考虑。研究局限/启示:本文对实践没有直接影响。但是,如果标准制定者和研究人员分别在其会计准则和研究中应用本研究定义的概念,这些标准或研究的结果最终可以对实践有用,特别是对投资者。关键词:会计信息,FASB/IASB概念框架,价值相关性,相关性,忠实表述稿件类型:文献综述JEL分类:M480
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信