Prominent ear correction: Three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
Alpay Duran, Oguz Cortuk, Sinem Eroglu
{"title":"Prominent ear correction: Three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty","authors":"Alpay Duran, Oguz Cortuk, Sinem Eroglu","doi":"10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article aims to present an alternative technique for elevating distal, proximal, and inferior based perichondrioadipodermal (PAD) flaps along with traditional otoplasty to correct ear lobule protrusion, covering the Mustarde and Furnas sutures, and lowering the potential risk and complications. Materials and Methods: This study included undergoing primary otoplasties and had the prominence of ear lobule protrusion and both ears. It included as many as 61 patients (122 ears) who complained of prominent ear deformity with the protruding earlobe and were operated on between February 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-four patients were male and 27 patients were female. The mean age of patients was 26 (9–39). The perpendicular distance from the mastoid to the helical rim's middle part and the antitragus to the mastoid area were measured at the level of Frankfort's horizontal line preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The value of auricular mastoid distance exceeding 20 mm in all situations preoperatively corresponded to a prominent ear. The distance between the antitragus and the mastoid area higher than 22 mm in any situation corresponded to a prominent lobule preoperatively. Results: The average width measured in the frontal view of the ear lowered from 29 ± 4 mm to 17 ± 3 mm postoperatively at 6 months. The average width measured in the lobules' frontal view postoperatively lowered from 27 ± 5 mm to 16 ± 4 mm at 6 months. A round, natural-looking, and durable shape were accomplished in all patients. No complications pertaining to prominent ear deformity or the lobule's correction were observed. No patient was found to experience suture extrusion, skin necrosis, hematoma, or wound infection either early or later at the postoperative period. Conclusion: This study presented a safe and effective three PAD flap technique combined with traditional otoplasty for addressing prominent ear deformity with protruding ear lobule. The advantages of this technique include round, durable, and natural-looking ear shape as well as a consequent natural-looking earlobe. Level of Evidence: V.","PeriodicalId":42065,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article aims to present an alternative technique for elevating distal, proximal, and inferior based perichondrioadipodermal (PAD) flaps along with traditional otoplasty to correct ear lobule protrusion, covering the Mustarde and Furnas sutures, and lowering the potential risk and complications. Materials and Methods: This study included undergoing primary otoplasties and had the prominence of ear lobule protrusion and both ears. It included as many as 61 patients (122 ears) who complained of prominent ear deformity with the protruding earlobe and were operated on between February 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-four patients were male and 27 patients were female. The mean age of patients was 26 (9–39). The perpendicular distance from the mastoid to the helical rim's middle part and the antitragus to the mastoid area were measured at the level of Frankfort's horizontal line preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The value of auricular mastoid distance exceeding 20 mm in all situations preoperatively corresponded to a prominent ear. The distance between the antitragus and the mastoid area higher than 22 mm in any situation corresponded to a prominent lobule preoperatively. Results: The average width measured in the frontal view of the ear lowered from 29 ± 4 mm to 17 ± 3 mm postoperatively at 6 months. The average width measured in the lobules' frontal view postoperatively lowered from 27 ± 5 mm to 16 ± 4 mm at 6 months. A round, natural-looking, and durable shape were accomplished in all patients. No complications pertaining to prominent ear deformity or the lobule's correction were observed. No patient was found to experience suture extrusion, skin necrosis, hematoma, or wound infection either early or later at the postoperative period. Conclusion: This study presented a safe and effective three PAD flap technique combined with traditional otoplasty for addressing prominent ear deformity with protruding ear lobule. The advantages of this technique include round, durable, and natural-looking ear shape as well as a consequent natural-looking earlobe. Level of Evidence: V.
突出耳矫正:三瓣技术结合常规耳成形术
背景:本文旨在介绍一种在传统耳成形术的基础上提升远端、近端和下端软骨脂肪真皮(PAD)皮瓣的替代技术,以纠正耳小叶突出,覆盖Mustarde和Furnas缝合线,降低潜在的风险和并发症。材料和方法:本研究包括行初级耳成形术,耳小叶突出和双耳突出。在2015年2月至2020年12月期间,共有61名患者(122只耳朵)抱怨耳垂突出的耳朵畸形,并接受了手术。男性34例,女性27例。患者平均年龄26岁(9-39岁)。术前和术后6个月分别在法兰克福水平线水平测量乳突至螺旋缘中段的垂直距离和对耳屏至乳突区的垂直距离。术前所有情况下耳乳突距离超过20mm的值均对应耳部突出。在任何情况下,对耳屏与乳突区之间的距离大于22mm,对应于术前有突出小叶。结果:术后6个月耳正面面平均宽度由29±4 mm降至17±3 mm。术后小叶正面位平均宽度由27±5 mm降至16±4 mm。所有患者均获得圆润、自然、耐用的外形。未观察到与突出耳畸形或小叶矫正有关的并发症。术后早期或后期均未发现患者出现缝线挤压、皮肤坏死、血肿或伤口感染。结论:本研究提出了一种安全有效的三片PAD皮瓣联合传统耳成形术治疗伴有耳小叶突出的耳部畸形。这种技术的优点包括圆形,耐用和自然的耳形,以及随之而来的自然的耳垂。证据等级:V。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信