Life Satisfaction of Holocaust Survivors

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
K. Horáčková, A. Ševčovičová, A. Ševčovičová, D. R. Ralbovská, D. R. Ralbovská, J. Capska, J. Capska, Ľ. Andraščíková, Ludmila, Andrascikova, M. Olah, M. Oláh
{"title":"Life Satisfaction of Holocaust Survivors","authors":"K. Horáčková, A. Ševčovičová, A. Ševčovičová, D. R. Ralbovská, D. R. Ralbovská, J. Capska, J. Capska, Ľ. Andraščíková, Ludmila, Andrascikova, M. Olah, M. Oláh","doi":"10.22359/cswhi_13_1_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Find out the impact of the Holocaust trauma on life satisfaction of alive Czech survivors, and to compare it with a control group of respondents.                                                       Design: Prospective study                                                       Participants: The total number of respondents in the study was 130. The exposed group consisted of 65 Czech Holocaust survivors (average age 88.5 years), control group of 65 Czech seniors (average age 88 years).  Methods: The article presents a quantitative research assessing the life satisfaction of survivors using the standardized Life Satisfaction Questionnaire by Fahrenberg et al. (1986) on a main group, and compares it with a control group. A nonparametric test for two selections (Mann – Whitney) at a significance level of 0.05 was used to test the hypotheses.                                                       Results: In spite of wide spectrum of the Holocaust effects, the exposed group shows higher or the same satisfactionin the most of the monitored areas compared to the control group (Health Me 4 vs. 3, p – 0.000; Workand employment Me 6 vs. 5, p – 0.000; Financial situation Me 6 vs. 4, p – 0.000; Leisure time Me 4 vs. 4, p – 0.002; Marriage and partnership Me 2 vs. 0, p – 0.284; Own self Me 4 vs. 3, p – 0.000; Sexuality Me 3 vs. 3, p – 0.879; Friends and acquaintances Me 5 vs. 4, p – 0.002; Housing Me 5 vs. 4, p – 0.000; Overall life satisfaction Me 5 vs. 4, p – 0.001). On the contrary, they are less satisfied in the area Children (Me 4 vs. 5, p – 0.016).                                                        Conclusions: The research displays integration of hardiness and vulnerability, lust for life and the ability of man to live and survive in extreme conditions and still feel a joy of life.","PeriodicalId":42256,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22359/cswhi_13_1_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Find out the impact of the Holocaust trauma on life satisfaction of alive Czech survivors, and to compare it with a control group of respondents.                                                       Design: Prospective study                                                       Participants: The total number of respondents in the study was 130. The exposed group consisted of 65 Czech Holocaust survivors (average age 88.5 years), control group of 65 Czech seniors (average age 88 years).  Methods: The article presents a quantitative research assessing the life satisfaction of survivors using the standardized Life Satisfaction Questionnaire by Fahrenberg et al. (1986) on a main group, and compares it with a control group. A nonparametric test for two selections (Mann – Whitney) at a significance level of 0.05 was used to test the hypotheses.                                                       Results: In spite of wide spectrum of the Holocaust effects, the exposed group shows higher or the same satisfactionin the most of the monitored areas compared to the control group (Health Me 4 vs. 3, p – 0.000; Workand employment Me 6 vs. 5, p – 0.000; Financial situation Me 6 vs. 4, p – 0.000; Leisure time Me 4 vs. 4, p – 0.002; Marriage and partnership Me 2 vs. 0, p – 0.284; Own self Me 4 vs. 3, p – 0.000; Sexuality Me 3 vs. 3, p – 0.879; Friends and acquaintances Me 5 vs. 4, p – 0.002; Housing Me 5 vs. 4, p – 0.000; Overall life satisfaction Me 5 vs. 4, p – 0.001). On the contrary, they are less satisfied in the area Children (Me 4 vs. 5, p – 0.016).                                                        Conclusions: The research displays integration of hardiness and vulnerability, lust for life and the ability of man to live and survive in extreme conditions and still feel a joy of life.
大屠杀幸存者的生活满意度
目的:了解大屠杀创伤对在世捷克幸存者生活满意度的影响,并与对照组受访者进行比较。                                                       设计:前瞻性研究                                                        研究参与者:受访者的总数是130。暴露组包括65名捷克大屠杀幸存者(平均年龄88.5岁),对照组65名捷克老年人(平均年龄88岁)。方法:采用Fahrenberg et al.(1986)的标准化生活满意度问卷对主要组进行定量研究,并与对照组进行比较。采用显著性水平为0.05的两个选择(Mann - Whitney)的非参数检验来检验假设。结果:尽管大屠杀影响范围广泛,但与对照组相比,暴露组在大多数监测地区表现出更高或相同的满意度(Health Me 4 vs. 3, p - 0.000;工作和就业Me 6 vs. 5, p - 0.000;财务状况:6比4,p - 0.000;闲暇时间:4比4,p - 0.002;婚姻与伴侣关系Me 2 vs. 0, p - 0.284;自我Me 4 vs. 3, p - 0.000;sex Me 3 vs. 3, p - 0.879;朋友和熟人Me 5 vs. 4, p - 0.002;住房Me 5 vs. 4, p - 0.000;总体生活满意度(5比4,p - 0.001)。相反,他们在儿童领域的满意度较低(me4 vs. 5, p - 0.016)。结论:该研究展示了坚韧与脆弱的融合,对生命的渴望,以及人类在极端条件下生存和生存的能力,并仍然感受到生活的乐趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention
Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信