Quality of Pork Cooked by Stir-Fry and Two Microwave Procedures

H. Cheng, R. E. Baldwin
{"title":"Quality of Pork Cooked by Stir-Fry and Two Microwave Procedures","authors":"H. Cheng, R. E. Baldwin","doi":"10.1080/16070658.1985.11720310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractTwo microwave procedures were compared with traditional stir-fry cooking for pork tenderloin. The microwave/heat resistant glass-plate method achieved a 26% energy saving, and the stir-fry method provided a 51% energy saving as compared to the microwave/browning utensil procedure. The meat cooked by the three methods did not differ in the sensory attributes of flavor, juiciness, color intensity or color uniformity. The meat cooked by the two microwave methods was less intense in aroma and less tender than the stir-fried pork, but the magnitude of difference between the means was small. Moisture, fat content, thiamin and riboflavin retention of the meat were not significantly different among the three cooking methods.","PeriodicalId":76653,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of microwave power","volume":"8 1","pages":"261-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of microwave power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16070658.1985.11720310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractTwo microwave procedures were compared with traditional stir-fry cooking for pork tenderloin. The microwave/heat resistant glass-plate method achieved a 26% energy saving, and the stir-fry method provided a 51% energy saving as compared to the microwave/browning utensil procedure. The meat cooked by the three methods did not differ in the sensory attributes of flavor, juiciness, color intensity or color uniformity. The meat cooked by the two microwave methods was less intense in aroma and less tender than the stir-fried pork, but the magnitude of difference between the means was small. Moisture, fat content, thiamin and riboflavin retention of the meat were not significantly different among the three cooking methods.
两种微波炒熟猪肉的品质研究
摘要比较了两种微波烹饪方法与传统的爆炒方法对猪里脊肉的影响。微波/耐热玻璃板法实现了26%的节能,与微波/褐化器具程序相比,炒菜法提供了51%的节能。三种方法煮熟的肉在风味、多汁性、颜色强度和颜色均匀性等感官属性上没有差异。两种微波方法烹煮的猪肉香气不强烈,肉质不嫩,但两者的差异不大。3种蒸煮方式对肉品的水分、脂肪含量、硫胺素和核黄素含量无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信