Comparative Analysis of Forensic Software on Android-based Blackberry Messenger using NIJ Framework

I. Riadi, S. Sunardi, Arizona Firdonsyah
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Forensic Software on Android-based Blackberry Messenger using NIJ Framework","authors":"I. Riadi, S. Sunardi, Arizona Firdonsyah","doi":"10.11591/EECSI.V5.1615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instant Messaging application is the most widely used application all over the world. Blackberry Messenger is a multiplatform instant messaging with lots of features that can be a magnet for many people to use Blackberry Messenger for commiting digital crimes. In the process of investigating digital crime cases, digital evidences are required. To obtain digital evidence, a set of forensic tools are needed to conduct forensic process on physical evidences. The topic of this research is to describe the forensic process and to compare the current forensic tools used based on acquired digital evidences by using method that refers to mobile device forensic guidelines made by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). The forensic tools used in this research are Magnet AXIOM, Belkasoft Evidence Center, and MOBILedit Forensic Express. The outcome shows that Magnet AXIOM has the highest capability to obtain digital evidences, Belkasoft Evidence Center has superiority in terms of data text acquisition, and MOBILedit Forensic Express has superiority in physical evidence preserving and cloning.","PeriodicalId":20498,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of the Electrical Engineering Computer Science and Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of the Electrical Engineering Computer Science and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/EECSI.V5.1615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Instant Messaging application is the most widely used application all over the world. Blackberry Messenger is a multiplatform instant messaging with lots of features that can be a magnet for many people to use Blackberry Messenger for commiting digital crimes. In the process of investigating digital crime cases, digital evidences are required. To obtain digital evidence, a set of forensic tools are needed to conduct forensic process on physical evidences. The topic of this research is to describe the forensic process and to compare the current forensic tools used based on acquired digital evidences by using method that refers to mobile device forensic guidelines made by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). The forensic tools used in this research are Magnet AXIOM, Belkasoft Evidence Center, and MOBILedit Forensic Express. The outcome shows that Magnet AXIOM has the highest capability to obtain digital evidences, Belkasoft Evidence Center has superiority in terms of data text acquisition, and MOBILedit Forensic Express has superiority in physical evidence preserving and cloning.
基于NIJ框架的android黑莓Messenger取证软件对比分析
即时通讯应用程序是世界上使用最广泛的应用程序。黑莓信使是一个多平台的即时通讯工具,具有许多功能,可以吸引许多人使用黑莓信使进行数字犯罪。在调查数字犯罪案件的过程中,需要数字证据。为了获取数字证据,需要一套法医工具对物证进行法医处理。本研究的主题是描述取证过程,并使用参考美国国家司法研究所(NIJ)制定的移动设备取证指南的方法,比较目前基于获取的数字证据使用的取证工具。本研究中使用的取证工具是Magnet AXIOM、Belkasoft Evidence Center和MOBILedit forensic Express。结果表明,Magnet AXIOM在获取数字证据方面的能力最高,Belkasoft Evidence Center在数据文本采集方面具有优势,MOBILedit Forensic Express在物证保存和克隆方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信