Wavefront Field Mapping Reveals a Physiologic Network Between Drivers Where Ablation Terminates Atrial Fibrillation.

George Leef, F. Shenasa, N. Bhatia, A. Rogers, W. Sauer, John M. Miller, Mark Swerdlow, M. Tamboli, M. Alhusseini, E. Armenia, T. Baykaner, J. Brachmann, M. Turakhia, F. Atienza, W. Rappel, Paul J. Wang, S. Narayan
{"title":"Wavefront Field Mapping Reveals a Physiologic Network Between Drivers Where Ablation Terminates Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"George Leef, F. Shenasa, N. Bhatia, A. Rogers, W. Sauer, John M. Miller, Mark Swerdlow, M. Tamboli, M. Alhusseini, E. Armenia, T. Baykaner, J. Brachmann, M. Turakhia, F. Atienza, W. Rappel, Paul J. Wang, S. Narayan","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nLocalized drivers are proposed mechanisms for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) from optical mapping of human atria and clinical studies of AF, yet are controversial because drivers fluctuate and ablating them may not terminate AF. We used wavefront field mapping to test the hypothesis that AF drivers, if concurrent, may interact to produce fluctuating areas of control to explain their appearance/disappearance and acute impact of ablation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe recruited 54 patients from an international registry in whom persistent AF terminated by targeted ablation. Unipolar AF electrograms were analyzed from 64-pole baskets to reconstruct activation times, map propagation vectors each 20 ms, and create nonproprietary phase maps.\n\n\nRESULTS\nEach patient (63.6±8.5 years, 29.6% women) showed 4.0±2.1 spatially anchored rotational or focal sites in AF in 3 patterns. First, a single (type I; n=7) or, second, paired chiral-antichiral (type II; n=5) rotational drivers controlled most of the atrial area. Ablation of 1 to 2 large drivers terminated all cases of types I or II AF. Third, interaction of 3 to 5 drivers (type III; n=42) with changing areas of control. Targeted ablation at driver centers terminated AF and required more ablation in types III versus I (P=0.02 in left atrium).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWavefront field mapping of persistent AF reveals a pathophysiologic network of a small number of spatially anchored rotational and focal sites, which interact, fluctuate, and control varying areas. Future work should define whether AF drivers that control larger atrial areas are attractive targets for ablation.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

BACKGROUND Localized drivers are proposed mechanisms for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) from optical mapping of human atria and clinical studies of AF, yet are controversial because drivers fluctuate and ablating them may not terminate AF. We used wavefront field mapping to test the hypothesis that AF drivers, if concurrent, may interact to produce fluctuating areas of control to explain their appearance/disappearance and acute impact of ablation. METHODS We recruited 54 patients from an international registry in whom persistent AF terminated by targeted ablation. Unipolar AF electrograms were analyzed from 64-pole baskets to reconstruct activation times, map propagation vectors each 20 ms, and create nonproprietary phase maps. RESULTS Each patient (63.6±8.5 years, 29.6% women) showed 4.0±2.1 spatially anchored rotational or focal sites in AF in 3 patterns. First, a single (type I; n=7) or, second, paired chiral-antichiral (type II; n=5) rotational drivers controlled most of the atrial area. Ablation of 1 to 2 large drivers terminated all cases of types I or II AF. Third, interaction of 3 to 5 drivers (type III; n=42) with changing areas of control. Targeted ablation at driver centers terminated AF and required more ablation in types III versus I (P=0.02 in left atrium). CONCLUSIONS Wavefront field mapping of persistent AF reveals a pathophysiologic network of a small number of spatially anchored rotational and focal sites, which interact, fluctuate, and control varying areas. Future work should define whether AF drivers that control larger atrial areas are attractive targets for ablation.
波前场映射揭示消融终止心房颤动驱动因素之间的生理网络。
从人类心房的光学成像和房颤的临床研究中,局部驱动因素被提出了持续性房颤(AF)的机制,但由于驱动因素波动和消融它们可能不会终止房颤,因此存在争议。我们使用波前场成像来验证房颤驱动因素的假设,即如果并发房颤驱动因素可能相互作用产生波动的控制区域,以解释它们的出现/消失和消融的急性影响。方法:我们从一个国际注册中心招募了54例通过靶向消融终止持续性房颤的患者。对64极篮的单极AF电图进行分析,以重建激活时间,绘制每20 ms的传播矢量,并创建非专有相位图。结果每例患者(63.6±8.5岁,女性29.6%)在3种类型的房颤中出现4.0±2.1个空间锚定的旋转或局灶点。首先,单一(I型;n=7),第二种是成对的手性-反手性(II型;N =5)旋转驱动器控制大部分心房面积。1 - 2个大驱动因素消融终止了所有I型或II型房颤病例。第三,3 - 5个驱动因素的相互作用(III型;N =42),随控制区域的变化而变化。在驱动中心靶向消融终止心房颤动,III型患者比I型患者需要更多的消融(左心房P=0.02)。结论:持续性房颤的波前场成像揭示了一个由少数空间锚定的旋转和病灶位点组成的病理生理网络,它们相互作用、波动并控制不同的区域。未来的工作应该确定控制更大心房区域的心房颤动驱动是否是有吸引力的消融目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信