Soviet Studies of Neocolonialism

Q2 Arts and Humanities
S. Bokeriya, Anna S. Davidchuk, D. Degterev, Ivan R. Dubrovskiy, Evgeniya V. Zhuravleva, Artem V. Enokyan, N. Ivkina, Maxim A. Nikulin, Nigusie Wolde Michae Kassaye, M. Shpakovskaya
{"title":"Soviet Studies of Neocolonialism","authors":"S. Bokeriya, Anna S. Davidchuk, D. Degterev, Ivan R. Dubrovskiy, Evgeniya V. Zhuravleva, Artem V. Enokyan, N. Ivkina, Maxim A. Nikulin, Nigusie Wolde Michae Kassaye, M. Shpakovskaya","doi":"10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-671-687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews Soviet and East German studies of neocolonialism that have been translated into Russian. A total of more than 60 monographs on Western neocolonialism have been systematically studied and finally compiled into an electronic archive in preparation for this publication. Based on the materials of Soviet studies, the article presents the main features of Western neocolonialism, related both to political manoeuvres and the economic arsenal of the former metropolitan powers. A detailed analysis of the narratives used by Western countries to emphasize their proximity to the “Third World” is given. Particular attention is paid to neocolonial theories, both “variants of well-known bourgeois and reformist concepts addressed to developing countries” and “concepts and theories specially created to support neocolonialism.” Neocolonial approaches were studied both in the context of individual Western countries and groups of states (Great Britain, France, Germany, the European Economic Community (EEC), USA) and by functional areas (technical assistance, food neocolonialism, international organizations). Regarding the UK, the differences in neocolonial policy between Labor Party and Conservatives are examined. The main instruments of France’s neocolonial policy are described and it is concluded that they have hardly changed in recent decades. The role of the FRG in the strategy of “European neocolonialism” is shown, and major characteristics of the neocolonial policy of the EEC are highlighted. With regard to the, authors speak of a new type of imperialist colonialism associated with American leadership in the institutions of the “collective West.” As for the United States, a new type of imperialist colonialism is being put forward, associated with America’s leadership in the institutions of the “collective West.” The origins and “running-in” of the US neocolonial tools are shown in detail, using the actual American colonial experience in the Philippines as an example. The main directions of critical analysis of the participation of Western countries in technical and food aid systems and in the activities of international organizations are presented. In conclusion, some remarks are formulated on the practical component of Soviet studies of neocolonialism. It is also stressed that in the mid-1980s, after the proclamation of the “New Political Thinking” the critical degree of Soviet studies of neocolonialism declined significantly.","PeriodicalId":55752,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-671-687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article reviews Soviet and East German studies of neocolonialism that have been translated into Russian. A total of more than 60 monographs on Western neocolonialism have been systematically studied and finally compiled into an electronic archive in preparation for this publication. Based on the materials of Soviet studies, the article presents the main features of Western neocolonialism, related both to political manoeuvres and the economic arsenal of the former metropolitan powers. A detailed analysis of the narratives used by Western countries to emphasize their proximity to the “Third World” is given. Particular attention is paid to neocolonial theories, both “variants of well-known bourgeois and reformist concepts addressed to developing countries” and “concepts and theories specially created to support neocolonialism.” Neocolonial approaches were studied both in the context of individual Western countries and groups of states (Great Britain, France, Germany, the European Economic Community (EEC), USA) and by functional areas (technical assistance, food neocolonialism, international organizations). Regarding the UK, the differences in neocolonial policy between Labor Party and Conservatives are examined. The main instruments of France’s neocolonial policy are described and it is concluded that they have hardly changed in recent decades. The role of the FRG in the strategy of “European neocolonialism” is shown, and major characteristics of the neocolonial policy of the EEC are highlighted. With regard to the, authors speak of a new type of imperialist colonialism associated with American leadership in the institutions of the “collective West.” As for the United States, a new type of imperialist colonialism is being put forward, associated with America’s leadership in the institutions of the “collective West.” The origins and “running-in” of the US neocolonial tools are shown in detail, using the actual American colonial experience in the Philippines as an example. The main directions of critical analysis of the participation of Western countries in technical and food aid systems and in the activities of international organizations are presented. In conclusion, some remarks are formulated on the practical component of Soviet studies of neocolonialism. It is also stressed that in the mid-1980s, after the proclamation of the “New Political Thinking” the critical degree of Soviet studies of neocolonialism declined significantly.
苏联新殖民主义研究
这篇文章回顾了被翻译成俄语的苏联和东德的新殖民主义研究。为准备本出版物,共系统研究了60多篇关于西方新殖民主义的专著,并最终汇编成电子档案。本文以苏联研究材料为基础,介绍了西方新殖民主义的主要特征,这些特征与前宗主国的政治策略和经济武器库有关。本文详细分析了西方国家用来强调他们接近“第三世界”的叙述。书中特别关注新殖民主义理论,包括“针对发展中国家的著名资产阶级和改良主义概念的变体”和“专门为支持新殖民主义而创造的概念和理论”。新殖民主义方法在个别西方国家和国家集团(英国、法国、德国、欧洲经济共同体、美国)和职能领域(技术援助、食品新殖民主义、国际组织)的背景下进行了研究。对于英国,考察了工党和保守党在新殖民主义政策上的差异。本文描述了法国新殖民主义政策的主要手段,得出的结论是,这些手段近几十年来几乎没有改变。揭示了欧洲经济共同体在“欧洲新殖民主义”战略中的作用,突出了欧洲经济共同体新殖民主义政策的主要特点。关于这一点,作者谈到了一种新型的帝国主义殖民主义,这种殖民主义与美国在“集体西方”机构中的领导地位有关。至于美国,一种新型的帝国主义殖民主义正在被提出,这与美国在“集体西方”机构中的领导地位有关。以美国在菲律宾的实际殖民经验为例,详细介绍了美国新殖民主义工具的起源和“磨合”。提出了对西方国家参与技术和粮食援助系统以及参与国际组织活动进行批判性分析的主要方向。最后,对苏联新殖民主义研究的实践成分作了一些评论。文章还强调,在“新政治思想”宣布后的80年代中期,苏联对新殖民主义研究的批判程度显著下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik RUDN International Relations
Vestnik RUDN International Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信