Assessment of ride comfort of traction elevators using ISO 18738-1:2012 and ISO 2631-4: 2001 standards

Conglin Li, Jiawei Lu, Jiankun Lai, Junbo Yao, Gang Xiao
{"title":"Assessment of ride comfort of traction elevators using ISO 18738-1:2012 and ISO 2631-4: 2001 standards","authors":"Conglin Li, Jiawei Lu, Jiankun Lai, Junbo Yao, Gang Xiao","doi":"10.1108/jimse-09-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeRide comfort is one of the important factors affecting passenger health. Therefore, the elevator industry usually uses the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 18738-1 standard to evaluate elevator ride quality and optimize elevator design. However, this method has certain limitations in its evaluation of comfort due to the problem of boundary division. The ISO 2631-4 standard is used as a general method of comfort evaluation in the current rail transit system, but it has not been applied in the elevator industry. In order to explore the difference and connection between the two standards, the author aims to conduct a detailed analysis on this.Design/methodology/approachBased on the elevator internet, a large amount of measured data of normal and abnormal vibration of elevator car were collected and analyzed and preprocessed; based on ISO 18738-1:2012 standard and ISO 2631-4:2001 standard, the differences of ride comfort assessment methods in the two standards were analyzed, and the ride comfort assessment study of elevator under normal and abnormal vibration conditions was carried out.FindingsThe experimental results show that the comfort assessment results of ISO 2631-4:2001 standard and ISO18738-1:2012 standard are consistent under two vibration conditions. At the same time, ISO 2631-4:2001 can not only provide a more accurate quantitative description of comfort, but also roughly determine the comfort interval of each vibration, which can provide theoretical reference for elevator vibration classification and car comfort design.Originality/valueThe authors designed an Internet of Things (IOT)-based elevator vibration signal acquisition method to address the shortcomings of the previous elevator ride comfort assessment methods, which can realize the dynamic assessment of elevator ride comfort; by comparing the assessment results of elevator ride comfort under normal vibration and abnormal vibration, the feasibility of ISO 2631-4:2001 for elevator ride comfort assessment was fully verified. In addition, the experimental results also give the influence of abnormal vibration on elevator riding comfort under the stages of start-stop, uniform speed, acceleration and deceleration, which can provide theoretical support for elevator vibration suppression and comfort transformation.","PeriodicalId":34604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jimse-09-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeRide comfort is one of the important factors affecting passenger health. Therefore, the elevator industry usually uses the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 18738-1 standard to evaluate elevator ride quality and optimize elevator design. However, this method has certain limitations in its evaluation of comfort due to the problem of boundary division. The ISO 2631-4 standard is used as a general method of comfort evaluation in the current rail transit system, but it has not been applied in the elevator industry. In order to explore the difference and connection between the two standards, the author aims to conduct a detailed analysis on this.Design/methodology/approachBased on the elevator internet, a large amount of measured data of normal and abnormal vibration of elevator car were collected and analyzed and preprocessed; based on ISO 18738-1:2012 standard and ISO 2631-4:2001 standard, the differences of ride comfort assessment methods in the two standards were analyzed, and the ride comfort assessment study of elevator under normal and abnormal vibration conditions was carried out.FindingsThe experimental results show that the comfort assessment results of ISO 2631-4:2001 standard and ISO18738-1:2012 standard are consistent under two vibration conditions. At the same time, ISO 2631-4:2001 can not only provide a more accurate quantitative description of comfort, but also roughly determine the comfort interval of each vibration, which can provide theoretical reference for elevator vibration classification and car comfort design.Originality/valueThe authors designed an Internet of Things (IOT)-based elevator vibration signal acquisition method to address the shortcomings of the previous elevator ride comfort assessment methods, which can realize the dynamic assessment of elevator ride comfort; by comparing the assessment results of elevator ride comfort under normal vibration and abnormal vibration, the feasibility of ISO 2631-4:2001 for elevator ride comfort assessment was fully verified. In addition, the experimental results also give the influence of abnormal vibration on elevator riding comfort under the stages of start-stop, uniform speed, acceleration and deceleration, which can provide theoretical support for elevator vibration suppression and comfort transformation.
使用ISO 18738-1:2012和ISO 2631- 1:20 01标准评估牵引电梯的乘坐舒适性
目的飞行舒适性是影响乘客健康的重要因素之一。因此,电梯行业通常采用国际标准化组织(ISO) 18738-1标准来评价电梯的乘坐质量,优化电梯设计。但由于边界划分问题,该方法在舒适性评价方面存在一定的局限性。ISO 2631-4标准是目前轨道交通系统舒适度评价的通用方法,但在电梯行业尚未得到应用。为了探究这两个标准之间的区别和联系,笔者将对此进行详细的分析。基于电梯网络,对电梯轿厢正常和异常振动的大量实测数据进行采集、分析和预处理;基于ISO 18738-1:2012标准和ISO 2631-4:2001标准,分析了两种标准中乘坐舒适性评价方法的差异,开展了电梯正常和异常振动条件下的乘坐舒适性评价研究。实验结果表明,在两种振动条件下,ISO 2631-4:2001标准和ISO18738-1:2012标准的舒适性评价结果是一致的。同时,ISO 2631-4:2001不仅可以提供更准确的舒适性定量描述,还可以大致确定每种振动的舒适区间,可为电梯振动分类和轿厢舒适性设计提供理论参考。针对以往电梯乘坐舒适性评估方法的不足,设计了一种基于物联网(IOT)的电梯振动信号采集方法,可实现电梯乘坐舒适性的动态评估;通过对比正常振动和异常振动下电梯乘坐舒适性的评价结果,充分验证了ISO 2631-4:2001进行电梯乘坐舒适性评价的可行性。此外,实验结果还给出了在启停、匀速、加减速等阶段异常振动对电梯乘坐舒适性的影响,为电梯振动抑制和舒适性改造提供理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书