{"title":"International trends in DM education","authors":"Karen Michelazzi","doi":"10.1017/IDM.2014.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: KMG Health Partners has delivered education, consulting and return to work services to a diverse range of international customers and clients since 1996. Our team has been directly involved in the development of standards of practice across several countries, and has had the opportunity to engage with organisations from the commercial and government sector in Canada, the U.K., Iceland, Norway, Austria, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Netherlands, and Sweden. Hypothesis: KMG has worked with organisations that are in various stages of development in their return to work, absence management, and disability management practices. KMG anticipated there would be common challenges, objectives, and desired outcomes amongst most countries. Methods: KMG has modified our education programmes in various countries to ensure that the content is consistent with local legislation, policy, and current standards of practice. This has included discussion and analysis on current local practices, and subsequent recommendations for policy development, standards of practice, and service delivery for workers and employers. KMG regularly reviews and incorporates international best practices established by key agencies, including the International Labour Organisation, the World Health Organisation, International Social Services Agency, and NIDMAR. Findings: Most countries have established or demonstrate a desire to establish best practice principles that are consistent with the 7 principles of effective disability management. Training and education that provides a common ideology for all stakeholders and meets both national and international best practice standards was observed to be a critical component to achieving success. Conclusions: There are similarities in the challenges, objectives, and desired outcomes across many countries. Variances can be attributed to factors that include government legislation, cultural beliefs, and pre-existing social programmes. The delivery of training and education that meets national and international best practice standards is a critical component in establishing effective policies and best practice in absence and disability management.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/IDM.2014.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: KMG Health Partners has delivered education, consulting and return to work services to a diverse range of international customers and clients since 1996. Our team has been directly involved in the development of standards of practice across several countries, and has had the opportunity to engage with organisations from the commercial and government sector in Canada, the U.K., Iceland, Norway, Austria, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Netherlands, and Sweden. Hypothesis: KMG has worked with organisations that are in various stages of development in their return to work, absence management, and disability management practices. KMG anticipated there would be common challenges, objectives, and desired outcomes amongst most countries. Methods: KMG has modified our education programmes in various countries to ensure that the content is consistent with local legislation, policy, and current standards of practice. This has included discussion and analysis on current local practices, and subsequent recommendations for policy development, standards of practice, and service delivery for workers and employers. KMG regularly reviews and incorporates international best practices established by key agencies, including the International Labour Organisation, the World Health Organisation, International Social Services Agency, and NIDMAR. Findings: Most countries have established or demonstrate a desire to establish best practice principles that are consistent with the 7 principles of effective disability management. Training and education that provides a common ideology for all stakeholders and meets both national and international best practice standards was observed to be a critical component to achieving success. Conclusions: There are similarities in the challenges, objectives, and desired outcomes across many countries. Variances can be attributed to factors that include government legislation, cultural beliefs, and pre-existing social programmes. The delivery of training and education that meets national and international best practice standards is a critical component in establishing effective policies and best practice in absence and disability management.
背景:KMG Health Partners自1996年以来一直为各种国际客户和客户提供教育、咨询和重返工作岗位的服务。我们的团队直接参与了多个国家实践标准的制定,并有机会与来自加拿大、英国、冰岛、挪威、奥地利、斯洛伐克、捷克共和国、荷兰和瑞典的商业和政府部门的组织进行合作。假设:KMG曾与处于不同发展阶段的组织合作,包括重返工作岗位、缺勤管理和残疾管理实践。KMG预计,大多数国家将面临共同的挑战、目标和期望的结果。方法:KMG已经修改了我们在不同国家的教育计划,以确保内容符合当地的立法、政策和现行的实践标准。这包括对当前地方做法的讨论和分析,以及随后对政策制定、做法标准和向工人和雇主提供服务提出的建议。KMG定期审查并纳入主要机构制定的国际最佳做法,包括国际劳工组织、世界卫生组织、国际社会服务机构和国家卫生和社会福利部。调查结果:大多数国家已经建立或表现出建立符合有效残疾管理七项原则的最佳做法原则的愿望。与会者认为,为所有利益攸关方提供共同意识形态并符合国家和国际最佳做法标准的培训和教育是取得成功的关键组成部分。结论:许多国家在挑战、目标和预期结果方面存在相似之处。差异可归因于包括政府立法、文化信仰和先前存在的社会计划在内的因素。提供符合国家和国际最佳做法标准的培训和教育是制定有效的缺席和残疾管理政策和最佳做法的关键组成部分。