Complexity of Qualitative Timeline-Based Planning

Time Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16
Dario Della Monica, N. Gigante, S. L. Torre, A. Montanari
{"title":"Complexity of Qualitative Timeline-Based Planning","authors":"Dario Della Monica, N. Gigante, S. L. Torre, A. Montanari","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The timeline-based approach to automated planning was originally developed in the context of space missions. In this approach, problem domains are expressed as systems consisting of independent but interacting components whose behaviors over time, the timelines, are governed by a set of temporal constraints, called synchronization rules. Although timeline-based system descriptions have been successfully used in practice for decades, the research on the theoretical aspects only started recently. In the last few years, some interesting results have been shown concerning both its expressive power and the computational complexity of the related planning problem. In particular, the general problem has been proved to be EXPSPACE-complete. Given the applicability of the approach in many practical scenarios, it is thus natural to ask whether computationally simpler but still expressive fragments can be identified. In this paper, we study the timeline-based planning problem with the restriction that only qualitative synchronization rules, i.e., rules without explicit time bounds in the constraints, are allowed. We show that the problem becomes PSPACE-complete. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Computing methodologies → Temporal reasoning","PeriodicalId":75226,"journal":{"name":"Time","volume":"1 1","pages":"16:1-16:13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The timeline-based approach to automated planning was originally developed in the context of space missions. In this approach, problem domains are expressed as systems consisting of independent but interacting components whose behaviors over time, the timelines, are governed by a set of temporal constraints, called synchronization rules. Although timeline-based system descriptions have been successfully used in practice for decades, the research on the theoretical aspects only started recently. In the last few years, some interesting results have been shown concerning both its expressive power and the computational complexity of the related planning problem. In particular, the general problem has been proved to be EXPSPACE-complete. Given the applicability of the approach in many practical scenarios, it is thus natural to ask whether computationally simpler but still expressive fragments can be identified. In this paper, we study the timeline-based planning problem with the restriction that only qualitative synchronization rules, i.e., rules without explicit time bounds in the constraints, are allowed. We show that the problem becomes PSPACE-complete. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Computing methodologies → Temporal reasoning
基于时间线的定性计划的复杂性
基于时间线的自动化规划方法最初是在空间任务的背景下发展起来的。在这种方法中,问题域被表示为由独立但相互作用的组件组成的系统,这些组件随时间的行为(时间线)由一组时间约束(称为同步规则)控制。尽管基于时间轴的系统描述在实践中已经成功应用了几十年,但在理论方面的研究才刚刚起步。在过去的几年里,关于它的表达能力和相关规划问题的计算复杂性已经显示出一些有趣的结果。特别是,一般问题已被证明是expspace完备的。考虑到该方法在许多实际场景中的适用性,因此很自然地要问是否可以识别计算更简单但仍然具有表现力的片段。本文研究了基于时间线的规划问题,该问题只允许定性同步规则,即约束中没有明确的时间界限的规则。我们证明了这个问题是pspace完备的。2012 ACM主题分类计算方法→时间推理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信