Farmers Fox Theory: Does a country's weak regulatory system benefit both the acquirer and the target firm? Evidence from Vodafone-Hutchison deal

Kotapati Srinivasa Reddy, Vinay Kumar Nangia, Rajat Agrawal
{"title":"Farmers Fox Theory: Does a country's weak regulatory system benefit both the acquirer and the target firm? Evidence from Vodafone-Hutchison deal","authors":"Kotapati Srinivasa Reddy,&nbsp;Vinay Kumar Nangia,&nbsp;Rajat Agrawal","doi":"10.1016/j.ism.2013.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extensive research on cross-border mergers and acquisitions performed in different institutional settings shows that legal and regulatory infrastructure, level of investor protection, and key macroeconomic factors are the most important determinants. With this in mind, we analyze and discuss the telecommunications market leader Vodafone's cross-border acquisition of Hutchison equity stake in CGP Investments, which had long-time delayed (litigated) in an Asian emerging market-India-in the view of corporate gains tax. Regarding theory testing and development, we test six theories propounded in management-related literature. Further, based on limitations of the existing theories we develop new theory-<em>Farmers Fox Theory</em>-and offer lawful propositions for future research that would advance the current international business and institutional knowledge. We therefore conclude that a given country's weak regulatory system benefits both the acquirer and the target firm; simultaneously, this behavior would adversely affect on economic/fiscal income of a nation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100721,"journal":{"name":"International Strategic Management Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 56-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ism.2013.10.001","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Strategic Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2306774813000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

The extensive research on cross-border mergers and acquisitions performed in different institutional settings shows that legal and regulatory infrastructure, level of investor protection, and key macroeconomic factors are the most important determinants. With this in mind, we analyze and discuss the telecommunications market leader Vodafone's cross-border acquisition of Hutchison equity stake in CGP Investments, which had long-time delayed (litigated) in an Asian emerging market-India-in the view of corporate gains tax. Regarding theory testing and development, we test six theories propounded in management-related literature. Further, based on limitations of the existing theories we develop new theory-Farmers Fox Theory-and offer lawful propositions for future research that would advance the current international business and institutional knowledge. We therefore conclude that a given country's weak regulatory system benefits both the acquirer and the target firm; simultaneously, this behavior would adversely affect on economic/fiscal income of a nation.

农民福克斯理论:一个国家薄弱的监管体系是否对收购者和目标公司都有利?来自沃达丰和记黄埔交易的证据
对在不同制度环境下进行的跨境并购进行的广泛研究表明,法律和监管基础设施、投资者保护水平以及关键的宏观经济因素是最重要的决定因素。考虑到这一点,我们从企业利得税的角度分析和讨论电信市场领导者沃达丰(Vodafone)跨境收购和记黄埔(Hutchison)在CGP Investments的股权,该交易在亚洲新兴市场印度长期拖延(诉讼)。在理论检验和发展方面,我们检验了管理相关文献中提出的六个理论。进一步,基于现有理论的局限性,我们提出了新的理论-农民福克斯理论,并为未来的研究提供了合法的主张,这将推动当前的国际商业和制度知识。因此,我们得出结论:一个给定国家的弱监管体系对收购方和目标公司都有利;同时,这种行为会对一个国家的经济/财政收入产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信