N. Hussein, R. Harrison, Calla M. Holmgren, Alexandra J D Phelps, G. Steinberg
{"title":"Risk Factors for Worsening Placental Invasion Within a Cohort of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Patients [ID: 1380333]","authors":"N. Hussein, R. Harrison, Calla M. Holmgren, Alexandra J D Phelps, G. Steinberg","doi":"10.1097/01.AOG.0000930372.93798.a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are overall well understood. We sought to evaluate whether those with more severe disease (increta/percreta) have a subset of patient-specific risk factors that could assist in preoperative planning. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved case–control study of patients diagnosed with PAS who underwent cesarean hysterectomy with pathology confirmed findings. Those with final pathology of placenta increta or percreta were compared to those whose final pathology demonstrated placenta accreta. Baseline characteristics and pregnancy histories were compared between groups via Student’s t tests and χ2 analysis, and a backwards logistic regression was performed to evaluate individual factors associated with more severe PAS invasion. RESULTS: A total of 83 participants met criteria with 51 (61.4%) diagnosed on pathology with increta/percreta. Those with increta/percreta had higher body mass index (34.3±7.0 versus 30.8±8.0) and higher number of prior cesarean births (2.2±1.0 versus 1.7±0.9), and were less likely to have undergone in vitro fertilization (3.9% versus 21.9%) or have a previous cesarean birth with two-layer closure compared to single-layer closure (25.0% versus 63.6%) (all P<.05). After controlling for confounders, there was a trend for more prior cesarean births to increase the risk of increta/percreta and for prior cesarean birth with two-layer closure to decrease the risk, but these were not statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.43–3.23, and aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18–1.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify patient-specific factors that increased the risk for more severe PAS invasion; however, there was a trend for multiple prior cesarean births and previous cesarean birth with single-layer closure to be associated with increased risk.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000930372.93798.a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are overall well understood. We sought to evaluate whether those with more severe disease (increta/percreta) have a subset of patient-specific risk factors that could assist in preoperative planning. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved case–control study of patients diagnosed with PAS who underwent cesarean hysterectomy with pathology confirmed findings. Those with final pathology of placenta increta or percreta were compared to those whose final pathology demonstrated placenta accreta. Baseline characteristics and pregnancy histories were compared between groups via Student’s t tests and χ2 analysis, and a backwards logistic regression was performed to evaluate individual factors associated with more severe PAS invasion. RESULTS: A total of 83 participants met criteria with 51 (61.4%) diagnosed on pathology with increta/percreta. Those with increta/percreta had higher body mass index (34.3±7.0 versus 30.8±8.0) and higher number of prior cesarean births (2.2±1.0 versus 1.7±0.9), and were less likely to have undergone in vitro fertilization (3.9% versus 21.9%) or have a previous cesarean birth with two-layer closure compared to single-layer closure (25.0% versus 63.6%) (all P<.05). After controlling for confounders, there was a trend for more prior cesarean births to increase the risk of increta/percreta and for prior cesarean birth with two-layer closure to decrease the risk, but these were not statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.43–3.23, and aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18–1.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify patient-specific factors that increased the risk for more severe PAS invasion; however, there was a trend for multiple prior cesarean births and previous cesarean birth with single-layer closure to be associated with increased risk.
简介:胎盘增生谱(PAS)的危险因素总体上很好理解。我们试图评估那些更严重的疾病(increta/percreta)是否有患者特异性的危险因素子集,可以帮助术前计划。方法:经机构审查委员会批准的经病理证实的剖宫产子宫切除术诊断为PAS的患者的病例对照研究。将最终病理表现为增生性胎盘或完全性胎盘的患者与最终病理表现为增生性胎盘的患者进行比较。通过Student’s t检验和χ2分析比较各组的基线特征和妊娠史,并进行反向logistic回归来评估与更严重PAS侵袭相关的个体因素。结果:共有83名参与者符合标准,其中51名(61.4%)被诊断为病理上的增量/percreta。increta/percreta患者的体重指数更高(34.3±7.0比30.8±8.0),既往剖宫产次数更高(2.2±1.0比1.7±0.9),并且接受过体外受精(3.9%比21.9%)或既往剖宫产两层封闭比单层封闭(25.0%比63.6%)的可能性更低(均P< 0.05)。在控制混杂因素后,既往剖宫产有增加增量/percreta风险的趋势,而既往剖宫产有两层闭合风险降低的趋势,但这些趋势均无统计学意义(调整比值比[aOR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.43-3.23, aOR为0.51,95% CI 0.18-1.46)。结论:我们的研究没有确定患者特异性因素增加更严重PAS侵袭的风险;然而,有趋势表明,既往多次剖宫产和既往剖宫产单层闭合与风险增加有关。