THE POCKET METHOD GIVES POOR RESULTS WHEN USED FOR FINGERTIP AMPUTATIONS WITH BONY FRAGMENTS

A. Nay, Kadir Tatlısu
{"title":"THE POCKET METHOD GIVES POOR RESULTS WHEN USED FOR FINGERTIP AMPUTATIONS WITH BONY FRAGMENTS","authors":"A. Nay, Kadir Tatlısu","doi":"10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the mid-term results of subdermal pocket replantation without vessel repair on fingertip amputation cases with bone fragments. Methods: In 2018-2019, nine patients’ eleven fingers whose fingertip amputation could not be repaired and be aplied sub dermal pocketing were included in the study. Satisfaction level, range of motion, length and survival rate, two-point static discrimination and Semmes Weinstein monofilament test were applied. Results: All of the patients included in the study were male and the mean age was 35.2 ± 13.5 years. The mean time be tween insertion and removal of the finger in the pocket is 16.45 ± 2.42 (14-21) days. The median of SMWT was 2.83 (2.83 – 6.65) and the mean of S2PD was 3.62 ± 0.38 (2.00 – 6.00) mm. The mean score of satisfaction was 65.9 ± 27.9 (0 – 100) out of hundred. Three patients’ three fingers survived and this patients were named as group A, and the other 6 patients (8 fingers) were named as group B. The average survival rate of three patients was 71.7 ± 33.2%. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age, waiting time in the pocket, SWMT, S2PD and satisfaction scores. Conclusions: Although pocket replantation method is an easy method to apply, it does not show perfect results in cases with bone fragments. It seems to be a viable method for providing venous drainage in fingertip amputations where artery repair can be performed but vein repair cannot be performed.","PeriodicalId":31023,"journal":{"name":"Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/handmicrosurg.72804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the mid-term results of subdermal pocket replantation without vessel repair on fingertip amputation cases with bone fragments. Methods: In 2018-2019, nine patients’ eleven fingers whose fingertip amputation could not be repaired and be aplied sub dermal pocketing were included in the study. Satisfaction level, range of motion, length and survival rate, two-point static discrimination and Semmes Weinstein monofilament test were applied. Results: All of the patients included in the study were male and the mean age was 35.2 ± 13.5 years. The mean time be tween insertion and removal of the finger in the pocket is 16.45 ± 2.42 (14-21) days. The median of SMWT was 2.83 (2.83 – 6.65) and the mean of S2PD was 3.62 ± 0.38 (2.00 – 6.00) mm. The mean score of satisfaction was 65.9 ± 27.9 (0 – 100) out of hundred. Three patients’ three fingers survived and this patients were named as group A, and the other 6 patients (8 fingers) were named as group B. The average survival rate of three patients was 71.7 ± 33.2%. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age, waiting time in the pocket, SWMT, S2PD and satisfaction scores. Conclusions: Although pocket replantation method is an easy method to apply, it does not show perfect results in cases with bone fragments. It seems to be a viable method for providing venous drainage in fingertip amputations where artery repair can be performed but vein repair cannot be performed.
当用于有骨碎片的指尖截肢时,口袋法的效果很差
背景:本研究的目的是探讨无血管修复的真皮下口袋再植术在有骨碎片的指尖截肢患者中的中期效果。方法:选取2018-2019年指尖截肢无法修复的11根手指患者9例进行皮下袋敷。采用满意度、活动范围、长度和存活率、两点静态判别和Semmes Weinstein单丝试验。结果:本组患者均为男性,平均年龄35.2±13.5岁。手指在口袋中插入和拔出的平均时间为16.45±2.42(14-21)天。SMWT中位数为2.83 (2.83 ~ 6.65)mm, S2PD中位数为3.62±0.38 (2.00 ~ 6.00)mm,满意度平均为65.9±27.9(0 ~ 100)分。3例患者3根手指存活,命名为A组,6例患者8根手指存活,命名为b组。3例患者平均生存率为71.7±33.2%。两组在年龄、口袋等待时间、SWMT、S2PD和满意度得分方面差异无统计学意义。结论:骨袋再植是一种简便易行的方法,但对骨碎片的修复效果并不理想。这似乎是一种可行的方法,提供静脉引流指尖截肢动脉修复,但不能进行静脉修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信