Pedagogy for Interdisciplinary Habits of Mind

D. Luckie, W. Newell
{"title":"Pedagogy for Interdisciplinary Habits of Mind","authors":"D. Luckie, W. Newell","doi":"10.32674/JISE.V8I1.584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, there has been little attempt made to collect, organize, and codify either the interdisciplinary habits of mind or the pedagogies used to promote them. Teaching interdisciplinary courses requires instilling interdisciplinary habits of mind by using strategies for active learning and reflective liberal thinking. This publication emerged from discussions and surveys used to evaluate interdisciplinary habits of mind and pedagogies which focused on four categories: drawing, modifying, integrating, and evaluating insights drawn from different disciplines. Prior to face-to-face discussions, surveys were sent to 75 expert faculty who had great experience teaching IDS courses. The survey and follow-up discussion examined the four categories of habits of mind one by one, identifying pedagogies useful in promoting any or all of the habits of mind within each category, and how each pedagogy works to clarify how it produces such habits of mind. The breakout discussions were observed, transcribed, and analyzed throughout the meetings. After analysis, the authors came to three conclusive inferences: (1) Course organization and structure have an important albeit indirect effect on pedagogy, (2) traditional pedagogies have an important role to play in teaching interdisciplinary courses, and (3) active learning is especially important in interdisciplinary pedagogy, not just a supplement.","PeriodicalId":93779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interdisciplinary studies in education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interdisciplinary studies in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32674/JISE.V8I1.584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the years, there has been little attempt made to collect, organize, and codify either the interdisciplinary habits of mind or the pedagogies used to promote them. Teaching interdisciplinary courses requires instilling interdisciplinary habits of mind by using strategies for active learning and reflective liberal thinking. This publication emerged from discussions and surveys used to evaluate interdisciplinary habits of mind and pedagogies which focused on four categories: drawing, modifying, integrating, and evaluating insights drawn from different disciplines. Prior to face-to-face discussions, surveys were sent to 75 expert faculty who had great experience teaching IDS courses. The survey and follow-up discussion examined the four categories of habits of mind one by one, identifying pedagogies useful in promoting any or all of the habits of mind within each category, and how each pedagogy works to clarify how it produces such habits of mind. The breakout discussions were observed, transcribed, and analyzed throughout the meetings. After analysis, the authors came to three conclusive inferences: (1) Course organization and structure have an important albeit indirect effect on pedagogy, (2) traditional pedagogies have an important role to play in teaching interdisciplinary courses, and (3) active learning is especially important in interdisciplinary pedagogy, not just a supplement.
跨学科思维习惯教学法
多年来,很少有人尝试收集、组织和编纂跨学科的思维习惯或用于促进它们的教学法。教授跨学科课程需要通过使用主动学习和反思自由思维的策略来灌输跨学科的思维习惯。该出版物来自于用于评估跨学科思维习惯和教学法的讨论和调查,主要集中在四个类别:绘制,修改,整合和评估来自不同学科的见解。在面对面讨论之前,向75名具有丰富IDS课程教学经验的专家教师发送了调查问卷。调查和后续讨论逐一检查了思维习惯的四个类别,确定了在每个类别中对促进任何或所有思维习惯有用的教学法,以及每种教学法是如何工作的,以阐明它是如何产生这种思维习惯的。在整个会议期间,对分组讨论进行了观察、记录和分析。经过分析,作者得出了三个结论性结论:(1)课程组织和结构对教学法有重要的间接影响;(2)传统教学法在跨学科课程教学中发挥着重要作用;(3)主动学习在跨学科教学法中尤为重要,而不仅仅是一种补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信