Medical, social and ethical issues related to COVID-19

F. Nezhmetdinova, Нежметдинова Фарида Тансыковна, M. E. Guryleva, Гурылёва Марина Элисовна
{"title":"Medical, social and ethical issues related to COVID-19","authors":"F. Nezhmetdinova, Нежметдинова Фарида Тансыковна, M. E. Guryleva, Гурылёва Марина Элисовна","doi":"10.17816/kmj2020-841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus strain (COVID-19) has suddenly and radically shattered all ideas about the norm, not only in medical practice but also in society. This has particularly affected the healthcare system, physicians, and the distribution of life-sustaining therapy in the context of limited resources and the absence of a known treatment protocol. One of the main ethical dilemmas of the coronavirus epidemic has been the confrontation between public health ethics, reflected in the fair distribution of limited resources and a focus on public safety, and patient-centred clinical ethics. Ultimately, the COVID-19 pandemic is putting medical staff in tragic situations that they have never faced. And in the case of a shortage of medical staff — doctors and nurses, ventilators and other life-supporting devices for patients or even just beds in hospitals, it frequently becomes necessary to classify patients and decide an order to determine who, where and what kind of help will receive (or not receive) and in what queue to provide it. Another important problem was the problem of digital control of citizens, who must limit their freedoms for preserving the health of other citizens. The fear is widely shared that the situation will allow manipulation citizens in the future when there is no epidemiological need. Also, the problem of the responsibi-lity of politicians and authorized organizations for the health not only its people but all over the world arises. These and other questions today require bioethical expertise.","PeriodicalId":17798,"journal":{"name":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj2020-841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The recent pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus strain (COVID-19) has suddenly and radically shattered all ideas about the norm, not only in medical practice but also in society. This has particularly affected the healthcare system, physicians, and the distribution of life-sustaining therapy in the context of limited resources and the absence of a known treatment protocol. One of the main ethical dilemmas of the coronavirus epidemic has been the confrontation between public health ethics, reflected in the fair distribution of limited resources and a focus on public safety, and patient-centred clinical ethics. Ultimately, the COVID-19 pandemic is putting medical staff in tragic situations that they have never faced. And in the case of a shortage of medical staff — doctors and nurses, ventilators and other life-supporting devices for patients or even just beds in hospitals, it frequently becomes necessary to classify patients and decide an order to determine who, where and what kind of help will receive (or not receive) and in what queue to provide it. Another important problem was the problem of digital control of citizens, who must limit their freedoms for preserving the health of other citizens. The fear is widely shared that the situation will allow manipulation citizens in the future when there is no epidemiological need. Also, the problem of the responsibi-lity of politicians and authorized organizations for the health not only its people but all over the world arises. These and other questions today require bioethical expertise.
与COVID-19相关的医疗、社会和伦理问题
最近由新型冠状病毒株(COVID-19)引起的大流行,不仅在医疗实践中,而且在社会中,突然彻底打破了所有关于规范的观念。在资源有限和缺乏已知治疗方案的情况下,这尤其影响了医疗保健系统、医生和维持生命治疗的分配。新冠肺炎疫情的主要伦理困境之一是公共卫生伦理与以患者为中心的临床伦理之间的对抗,这体现在有限资源的公平分配和对公共安全的关注上。最终,COVID-19大流行将医务人员置于他们从未面临过的悲惨境地。在医护人员短缺的情况下——医生和护士、病人的呼吸机和其他维持生命的设备,甚至医院里只有病床——经常需要对病人进行分类,并决定一个命令,以确定谁、在哪里、接受(或不接受)什么样的帮助,以及以什么样的队列提供帮助。另一个重要问题是公民的数字控制问题,他们必须限制自己的自由,以保护其他公民的健康。人们普遍担心,未来在没有流行病学需要的情况下,这种情况将允许操纵公民。此外,还出现了政治家和授权组织不仅对其人民而且对全世界人民的健康负有责任的问题。今天,这些问题和其他问题都需要生物伦理学专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信