Comparing the effects of peripheral nerve block and general anesthesia with general anesthesia alone on postoperative delirium and complications in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide database.

Manabu Yoshimura, Hiroko Shiramoto, Mami Koga, Aya Yoshimatsu, Yasuhiro Morimoto
{"title":"Comparing the effects of peripheral nerve block and general anesthesia with general anesthesia alone on postoperative delirium and complications in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide database.","authors":"Manabu Yoshimura, Hiroko Shiramoto, Mami Koga, Aya Yoshimatsu, Yasuhiro Morimoto","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2022-103566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The difference between the effects of peripheral nerve block (PNB) with general anesthesia (GA) and GA alone on the patients' postoperative clinical outcomes remains unknown. We assessed whether there is a difference in postoperative delirium and composite morbidity between patients receiving GA with PNB and GA alone using a national clinical database in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the outcomes of patients receiving GA with PNB and GA alone from April 2016 to October 2019. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium, defined as a status requiring newly prescribed antipsychotic drugs or that given the code of a reimbursable disease after the surgery date. The secondary outcome was morbidity incidence as the occurrence of at least one of any of the following life-threatening complications. We conducted propensity score-matched analyses using covariates for patients who underwent any surgical procedure. We used instrumental variables and restricted the definition of postoperative delirium and subgroup for sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 653,759 patients, 90,358 received GA-PNB and 563,401 received only GA. After 1:4 propensity score matching, 89,754 patients were included in the GA-PNB and 359,015 in the GA. The adjusted ORs for postoperative delirium and composite morbidity were 0.96 (95% CIs 0.94 to 0.99; p<0.01), 0.80 (95% CIs 0.76 to 0.83; p<0.001), respectively, for the GA-PNB concerning the GA. For sensitivity analyses, findings were also consistent with instrumental variables and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This retrospective, nationwide cohort study demonstrated that GA-PNB was associated with a small reduction in the likelihood of postoperative delirium and a moderate reduction in the likelihood of composite morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The difference between the effects of peripheral nerve block (PNB) with general anesthesia (GA) and GA alone on the patients' postoperative clinical outcomes remains unknown. We assessed whether there is a difference in postoperative delirium and composite morbidity between patients receiving GA with PNB and GA alone using a national clinical database in Japan.

Methods: We compared the outcomes of patients receiving GA with PNB and GA alone from April 2016 to October 2019. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium, defined as a status requiring newly prescribed antipsychotic drugs or that given the code of a reimbursable disease after the surgery date. The secondary outcome was morbidity incidence as the occurrence of at least one of any of the following life-threatening complications. We conducted propensity score-matched analyses using covariates for patients who underwent any surgical procedure. We used instrumental variables and restricted the definition of postoperative delirium and subgroup for sensitivity analyses.

Results: Of 653,759 patients, 90,358 received GA-PNB and 563,401 received only GA. After 1:4 propensity score matching, 89,754 patients were included in the GA-PNB and 359,015 in the GA. The adjusted ORs for postoperative delirium and composite morbidity were 0.96 (95% CIs 0.94 to 0.99; p<0.01), 0.80 (95% CIs 0.76 to 0.83; p<0.001), respectively, for the GA-PNB concerning the GA. For sensitivity analyses, findings were also consistent with instrumental variables and subgroup analyses.

Discussion: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study demonstrated that GA-PNB was associated with a small reduction in the likelihood of postoperative delirium and a moderate reduction in the likelihood of composite morbidity.

比较周围神经阻滞和全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉对老年患者术后谵妄和并发症的影响:一项利用全国性数据库进行的回顾性队列研究。
导言:外周神经阻滞(PNB)联合全身麻醉(GA)与单纯GA对患者术后临床结果的影响之间的差异仍然未知。我们利用日本的国家临床数据库评估了接受外周神经阻滞与单纯外周神经阻滞的患者在术后谵妄和综合发病率方面是否存在差异:我们比较了2016年4月至2019年10月期间接受GA联合PNB和单纯GA的患者的结果。主要结果是术后谵妄,定义为需要新处方抗精神病药物的状态,或在手术日期后被赋予可报销疾病代码的状态。次要结果是发病率,即至少发生一种以下危及生命的并发症。我们对接受任何外科手术的患者进行了倾向评分匹配分析,并使用了协变量。我们使用了工具变量,并对术后谵妄的定义和亚组进行了限制,以进行敏感性分析:在 653,759 名患者中,90,358 人接受了 GA-PNB 治疗,563,401 人仅接受了 GA 治疗。经过 1:4 倾向评分匹配后,89754 名患者被纳入 GA-PNB 组,359015 名患者被纳入 GA 组。术后谵妄和综合发病率的调整 ORs 为 0.96(95% CIs 为 0.94 至 0.99;p 讨论:这项全国范围的回顾性队列研究表明,GA-PNB 与术后谵妄可能性的小幅降低和复合发病率的中度降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信