Probabilistic Corrosion Assessment for Natural Gas Storage Wells

B. Ayton, T. Dessein, A. Fraser, Mari Shironishi, Travis Sera, Daniel Shapiro
{"title":"Probabilistic Corrosion Assessment for Natural Gas Storage Wells","authors":"B. Ayton, T. Dessein, A. Fraser, Mari Shironishi, Travis Sera, Daniel Shapiro","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-86794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Regulations for gas storage wells require that operators perform initial and subsequent mechanical integrity evaluations as determined using risk assessment [1], incorporated by reference in 49 CFR 192.12 for U.S. operators [2]. As a well ages, metal loss on the casing can grow, increasing the probability of a failure from corrosion. Inspection and repair programs manage this probability by reducing uncertainty in the casing condition and repairing significant metal loss anomalies. However, performing a casing inspection involves a considerable amount of risk, which can vary depending on the well configuration [3]. The benefit of inspection and repair needs to be balanced with the inspection risk to determine the interval that minimizes the overall risk. This paper demonstrates that if detailed information about a well’s configuration, loading, and existing corrosion population is considered, a probabilistic corrosion analysis can be completed to determine a reinspection date that minimizes the overall risk of a release.\n A probabilistic implementation of the Level II analysis found in API 579 Fitness-For-Service is described and recommended for these assessments [4]. The deterministic version of this model is the most accurate for predicting burst pressures of casings with metal loss under a wide range of loading conditions [5].\n The measurement error of inspection tools and their reporting thresholds relative to typical corrosion rates presents many challenges in calculating corrosion rates deterministically. Calculating unrealistically high growth rates and apparent negative growth rates using inspection data is common. Using the tool measurement error and the distribution of calculated growth rates across several wells, a Bayesian updating approach is described, grouping anomalies in similar environments to develop credible growth rate distributions specific to each joint on a well.\n This paper provides several assessments of realistic storage well configurations and corrosion populations to demonstrate how the probabilistic corrosion assessment can determine an inspection interval that minimizes the overall risk and ultimately inform integrity maintenance plans on a well-by-well basis. The examples span a wide range of well conditions to illustrate that the optimal inspection and repair program depends on each well’s configuration, loading, and existing corrosion population. The effect of a corrosion anomaly’s depth in the well and the cement quality on the expected release rate and the resulting risk is also examined.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-86794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulations for gas storage wells require that operators perform initial and subsequent mechanical integrity evaluations as determined using risk assessment [1], incorporated by reference in 49 CFR 192.12 for U.S. operators [2]. As a well ages, metal loss on the casing can grow, increasing the probability of a failure from corrosion. Inspection and repair programs manage this probability by reducing uncertainty in the casing condition and repairing significant metal loss anomalies. However, performing a casing inspection involves a considerable amount of risk, which can vary depending on the well configuration [3]. The benefit of inspection and repair needs to be balanced with the inspection risk to determine the interval that minimizes the overall risk. This paper demonstrates that if detailed information about a well’s configuration, loading, and existing corrosion population is considered, a probabilistic corrosion analysis can be completed to determine a reinspection date that minimizes the overall risk of a release. A probabilistic implementation of the Level II analysis found in API 579 Fitness-For-Service is described and recommended for these assessments [4]. The deterministic version of this model is the most accurate for predicting burst pressures of casings with metal loss under a wide range of loading conditions [5]. The measurement error of inspection tools and their reporting thresholds relative to typical corrosion rates presents many challenges in calculating corrosion rates deterministically. Calculating unrealistically high growth rates and apparent negative growth rates using inspection data is common. Using the tool measurement error and the distribution of calculated growth rates across several wells, a Bayesian updating approach is described, grouping anomalies in similar environments to develop credible growth rate distributions specific to each joint on a well. This paper provides several assessments of realistic storage well configurations and corrosion populations to demonstrate how the probabilistic corrosion assessment can determine an inspection interval that minimizes the overall risk and ultimately inform integrity maintenance plans on a well-by-well basis. The examples span a wide range of well conditions to illustrate that the optimal inspection and repair program depends on each well’s configuration, loading, and existing corrosion population. The effect of a corrosion anomaly’s depth in the well and the cement quality on the expected release rate and the resulting risk is also examined.
天然气储气井的概率腐蚀评价
储气井法规要求作业公司根据风险评估[1]进行初始和后续的机械完整性评估,该评估参考了49 CFR 192.12对美国作业公司[2]的参考。随着油井的老化,套管上的金属损失会增加,腐蚀导致失效的可能性也会增加。检查和修复程序通过减少套管状况的不确定性和修复严重的金属损失异常来管理这种可能性。然而,进行套管检查涉及相当大的风险,这取决于井的配置。检查和维修的收益需要与检查风险相平衡,以确定使总体风险最小化的间隔。本文表明,如果考虑到井的配置、载荷和现有腐蚀种群的详细信息,则可以完成概率腐蚀分析,以确定复检日期,从而最大限度地降低释放的总体风险。本文描述了API 579 Fitness-For-Service中二级分析的概率实现,并为这些评估推荐了[4]。该模型的确定性版本最准确地预测了各种载荷条件下金属损失套管的破裂压力。相对于典型腐蚀速率,检测工具的测量误差及其报告阈值给确定计算腐蚀速率带来了许多挑战。利用检验数据计算不切实际的高增长率和明显的负增长率是很常见的。利用工具测量误差和几口井计算出的生长速率分布,描述了一种贝叶斯更新方法,将类似环境中的异常分组,以确定井中每个节的可靠生长速率分布。本文提供了对实际储油井配置和腐蚀情况的几种评估,以演示概率腐蚀评估如何确定检查间隔,从而最大限度地降低总体风险,并最终为每口井的完整性维护计划提供信息。这些例子涵盖了广泛的井况,说明了最佳的检查和修复方案取决于每口井的配置、载荷和现有的腐蚀种群。此外,还研究了腐蚀异常的井深和水泥质量对预期释放速率和由此产生的风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信