Almost Tight Bounds for Online Facility Location in the Random-Order Model

Haim Kaplan, David Naori, D. Raz
{"title":"Almost Tight Bounds for Online Facility Location in the Random-Order Model","authors":"Haim Kaplan, David Naori, D. Raz","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2207.08783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the online facility location problem with uniform facility costs in the random-order model. Meyerson's algorithm [FOCS'01] is arguably the most natural and simple online algorithm for the problem with several advantages and appealing properties. Its analysis in the random-order model is one of the cornerstones of random-order analysis beyond the secretary problem. Meyerson's algorithm was shown to be (asymptotically) optimal in the standard worst-case adversarial-order model and $8$-competitive in the random order model. While this bound in the random-order model is the long-standing state-of-the-art, it is not known to be tight, and the true competitive-ratio of Meyerson's algorithm remained an open question for more than two decades. We resolve this question and prove tight bounds on the competitive-ratio of Meyerson's algorithm in the random-order model, showing that it is exactly $4$-competitive. Following our tight analysis, we introduce a generic parameterized version of Meyerson's algorithm that retains all the advantages of the original version. We show that the best algorithm in this family is exactly $3$-competitive. On the other hand, we show that no online algorithm for this problem can achieve a competitive-ratio better than $2$. Finally, we prove that the algorithms in this family are robust to partial adversarial arrival orders.","PeriodicalId":92709,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms","volume":"10 1","pages":"1523-1544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.08783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We study the online facility location problem with uniform facility costs in the random-order model. Meyerson's algorithm [FOCS'01] is arguably the most natural and simple online algorithm for the problem with several advantages and appealing properties. Its analysis in the random-order model is one of the cornerstones of random-order analysis beyond the secretary problem. Meyerson's algorithm was shown to be (asymptotically) optimal in the standard worst-case adversarial-order model and $8$-competitive in the random order model. While this bound in the random-order model is the long-standing state-of-the-art, it is not known to be tight, and the true competitive-ratio of Meyerson's algorithm remained an open question for more than two decades. We resolve this question and prove tight bounds on the competitive-ratio of Meyerson's algorithm in the random-order model, showing that it is exactly $4$-competitive. Following our tight analysis, we introduce a generic parameterized version of Meyerson's algorithm that retains all the advantages of the original version. We show that the best algorithm in this family is exactly $3$-competitive. On the other hand, we show that no online algorithm for this problem can achieve a competitive-ratio better than $2$. Finally, we prove that the algorithms in this family are robust to partial adversarial arrival orders.
随机顺序模型中在线设施位置的几乎紧边界
研究了随机顺序模型下具有统一设施成本的在线设施选址问题。Meyerson算法[FOCS'01]可以说是该问题最自然、最简单的在线算法,它具有几个优点和吸引人的特性。它在随机顺序模型中的分析是秘书问题以外的随机顺序分析的基础之一。Meyerson算法在标准最坏情况下具有(渐近)最优性,在随机顺序模型中具有$8$竞争性。虽然随机顺序模型中的这个界限是长期以来的最先进的技术,但它并不知道是紧密的,并且Meyerson算法的真正竞争比在二十多年来仍然是一个开放的问题。我们解决了这一问题,并证明了Meyerson算法在随机序模型下的竞争比的紧界,表明它正好是$4$竞争。在我们严格的分析之后,我们引入了一个通用的参数化版本的Meyerson算法,它保留了原始版本的所有优点。我们证明了这个家族中最好的算法正好是$3$竞争性的。另一方面,我们证明了该问题的在线算法无法获得优于$2$的竞争比。最后,我们证明了这类算法对部分对抗到达顺序具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书