Hand Tracing Verses Digital Tracing with PACS Method

Abhinav Gupta, M. Jha, S. Saurav
{"title":"Hand Tracing Verses Digital Tracing with PACS Method","authors":"Abhinav Gupta, M. Jha, S. Saurav","doi":"10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.11.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Traditionally, cephalometric analysis has been carried out using a hand-tracing manual method. In imaging, picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are information management systems used for the capture and measurement of medical and dental radiographs. Although not customized for lateral cephalometry, this study aimed to evaluate the cephalometric measurements made on screen with Nemoceph NX 2006 software using PACS compared with the conventional hand-tracing method. Material and methods: All the subjects were positioned in the cephalostat with the sagittal plane at right angles to the path of the X-rays and to the Frankfort plane parallel to the floor. That digital cephalogram was sent to printer via Image Dent software to print the hard copy through Laser printer and it is also transferred to the personal computer of Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics by PACS (picture archiving and communication systems) method. Results: In this study the total time taken in manual tracing is 30 min, while digital tracing takes around 35 min. So, Time taken in manual tracing is less than digital tracing that might be because only few parameters has been included in this study. The results showed no statistically significant differences in any of the assessed measurements (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Conventional and computerized methods showed consistency in all angular and linear measurements. The computer program Nemotech dental studio NX 2006 can be used reliably as an aid in diagnosing, planning, monitoring and evaluating orthodontic treatment both in clinical and research settings.","PeriodicalId":13918,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.11.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, cephalometric analysis has been carried out using a hand-tracing manual method. In imaging, picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are information management systems used for the capture and measurement of medical and dental radiographs. Although not customized for lateral cephalometry, this study aimed to evaluate the cephalometric measurements made on screen with Nemoceph NX 2006 software using PACS compared with the conventional hand-tracing method. Material and methods: All the subjects were positioned in the cephalostat with the sagittal plane at right angles to the path of the X-rays and to the Frankfort plane parallel to the floor. That digital cephalogram was sent to printer via Image Dent software to print the hard copy through Laser printer and it is also transferred to the personal computer of Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics by PACS (picture archiving and communication systems) method. Results: In this study the total time taken in manual tracing is 30 min, while digital tracing takes around 35 min. So, Time taken in manual tracing is less than digital tracing that might be because only few parameters has been included in this study. The results showed no statistically significant differences in any of the assessed measurements (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Conventional and computerized methods showed consistency in all angular and linear measurements. The computer program Nemotech dental studio NX 2006 can be used reliably as an aid in diagnosing, planning, monitoring and evaluating orthodontic treatment both in clinical and research settings.
手描与PACS方法的数字描
传统上,头颅测量分析是使用手描手工方法进行的。在成像中,图像存档和通信系统(PACS)是用于捕获和测量医疗和牙科放射照片的信息管理系统。虽然不是为侧位头测量量身定制的,但本研究旨在评估使用PACS的Nemoceph NX 2006软件在屏幕上进行的头测量,并与传统的手描方法进行比较。材料和方法:所有受试者均放置于头部平面镜中,矢状面与x射线路径成直角,与法兰克福平面平行于地板。该数字脑图通过Image Dent软件发送到打印机,通过激光打印机打印硬拷贝,并通过PACS(图片存档和通信系统)方式传输到正畸牙面矫形科的个人电脑。结果:在本研究中,手工跟踪的总时间为30分钟,而数字跟踪的总时间为35分钟左右。因此,手工跟踪的时间比数字跟踪的时间要短,这可能是由于本研究中只包含了很少的参数。结果显示,在任何评估的测量中,没有统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:传统方法和计算机方法在所有角度和线性测量中均具有一致性。计算机程序Nemotech牙科工作室NX 2006可以可靠地用作诊断,计划,监测和评估临床和研究环境中的正畸治疗的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信