Inference on the Surveying Methods at the 8th Century in Japan

Kaoru Yoshida
{"title":"Inference on the Surveying Methods at the 8th Century in Japan","authors":"Kaoru Yoshida","doi":"10.11648/J.AJCE.20200805.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ancient regional records on geography named Fudoki were compiled in Japan at the 8th century. There were about 60 provinces at that time, but only 5 Fudoki (transcripts) have remained at present. Among them, Izumo Fudoki (edited in 733) is not only almost complete, but also contains detailed geographic data (surveying data) not found in the others. The surveying data are distances between major points, heights and sizes of mountains, sizes of lakes and isles etc. However, there are many differences when comparing these surveying data with actual sites. The Fudoki researchers had tried many times to interpret the relationships between the two, but many unclear points have remained. During the time, we civil engineers had little interest in the Fudoki. In this paper, we estimated the surveying methods by comparing the Fudoki data with map data and confirming the sites, then obtained the following conclusions. The distances were almost correct, the heights of the mountains were converted using the number of steps, the perimeters of the mountains were calculated with the trails as diameters, and the sizes of the lakes and isles were the lengths of the waterways. The surveying methods at that time were simple, but the results obtained were practical. We think that these ancient surveying methods were widely used, not in one region or one period.","PeriodicalId":7606,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJCE.20200805.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ancient regional records on geography named Fudoki were compiled in Japan at the 8th century. There were about 60 provinces at that time, but only 5 Fudoki (transcripts) have remained at present. Among them, Izumo Fudoki (edited in 733) is not only almost complete, but also contains detailed geographic data (surveying data) not found in the others. The surveying data are distances between major points, heights and sizes of mountains, sizes of lakes and isles etc. However, there are many differences when comparing these surveying data with actual sites. The Fudoki researchers had tried many times to interpret the relationships between the two, but many unclear points have remained. During the time, we civil engineers had little interest in the Fudoki. In this paper, we estimated the surveying methods by comparing the Fudoki data with map data and confirming the sites, then obtained the following conclusions. The distances were almost correct, the heights of the mountains were converted using the number of steps, the perimeters of the mountains were calculated with the trails as diameters, and the sizes of the lakes and isles were the lengths of the waterways. The surveying methods at that time were simple, but the results obtained were practical. We think that these ancient surveying methods were widely used, not in one region or one period.
八世纪日本测量方法之推论
8世纪,日本编纂了名为《福道纪》(Fudoki)的古代地理地志。当时大约有60个省,但现在只剩下5个省。其中,《出云福道纪》(733年编)不仅基本完整,而且还包含了其他书中没有的详细地理数据(测量数据)。测量数据包括主要点之间的距离、山脉的高度和大小、湖泊和岛屿的大小等。然而,当将这些测量数据与实际站点进行比较时,存在许多差异。福多奇大学的研究人员曾多次试图解释这两者之间的关系,但仍有许多不清楚的地方。当时,我们这些土木工程师对福多木没什么兴趣。本文通过将福多基数据与地图数据进行对比,并对地点进行确认,对调查方法进行了估计,得出以下结论:距离几乎是正确的,山的高度是用台阶数换算出来的,山的周长是用小径作为直径计算出来的,湖泊和岛屿的大小是用水道的长度计算出来的。当时的测量方法简单,但得到的结果却很实用。我们认为这些古老的测量方法是广泛使用的,而不是在一个地区或一个时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信