Comparative Outcome of Short Term Versus Long Term Catheterization after Vaginal Hysterectomy

S. Akther, S. Siddiqua, N. Sultana, F. Mabud, Md. Abul Hossen, Priyanka Waddader
{"title":"Comparative Outcome of Short Term Versus Long Term Catheterization after Vaginal Hysterectomy","authors":"S. Akther, S. Siddiqua, N. Sultana, F. Mabud, Md. Abul Hossen, Priyanka Waddader","doi":"10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Urinary catheterization after vaginal hysterectomy is commonly performed to evaluate urine output and to avoid urinary retention. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages of short term catheterization in comparison to long term catheterization after vaginal hysterectomy due to uterovaginal prolapse. \nMaterials and methods: This randomized clinical study was conducted for 1 year (July 2014- July 2015) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH) on 100 women with 20 utero vaginal prolapse underwent vaginal hysterectomy. After selection and randomization women who had under gone vaginal hysterectomy were grouped two. Urinary catheter was removed after 24 hours in group A and after 72 hours in group B. Observations were recorded and statistical analysis performed. \nResults: Study showed that duration of catheter did not affect the duration of first voiding time after removal of catheter (RR=.934). 6% of women in group A and 2% women in group B had residual volume of urine >200 ml but residual volume of urine was significantly higher in group B (RR=0.714). Re-catheterization needed 6% patients in group A and 2% in group B (RR= 3.000). Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) was significantly higher 14% versus 2% in group B than group A (RR= 0.143). Mean duration of hospital stay after operation was 2.58 days in group A and 4.16 days in group B (RR= 0.480). \nConclusion: Short term catheterization is more beneficial than long term catheterization. Because it results in low incidence of urinary tract infection, less patient discomfort and reduces the mean hospital stay. \nJCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 83-88","PeriodicalId":93458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary catheterization after vaginal hysterectomy is commonly performed to evaluate urine output and to avoid urinary retention. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages of short term catheterization in comparison to long term catheterization after vaginal hysterectomy due to uterovaginal prolapse. Materials and methods: This randomized clinical study was conducted for 1 year (July 2014- July 2015) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH) on 100 women with 20 utero vaginal prolapse underwent vaginal hysterectomy. After selection and randomization women who had under gone vaginal hysterectomy were grouped two. Urinary catheter was removed after 24 hours in group A and after 72 hours in group B. Observations were recorded and statistical analysis performed. Results: Study showed that duration of catheter did not affect the duration of first voiding time after removal of catheter (RR=.934). 6% of women in group A and 2% women in group B had residual volume of urine >200 ml but residual volume of urine was significantly higher in group B (RR=0.714). Re-catheterization needed 6% patients in group A and 2% in group B (RR= 3.000). Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) was significantly higher 14% versus 2% in group B than group A (RR= 0.143). Mean duration of hospital stay after operation was 2.58 days in group A and 4.16 days in group B (RR= 0.480). Conclusion: Short term catheterization is more beneficial than long term catheterization. Because it results in low incidence of urinary tract infection, less patient discomfort and reduces the mean hospital stay. JCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 83-88
阴道子宫切除术后短期与长期置管的比较结果
背景:阴道子宫切除术后导尿通常用于评估尿量和避免尿潴留。本研究的目的是确定短期导管置入与长期导管置入阴道子宫切除术后由于子宫阴道脱垂的优越性。材料与方法:在吉大港医学院附属医院妇产科进行为期1年(2014年7月- 2015年7月)的随机临床研究,对100例20子宫阴道脱垂患者行阴道子宫切除术。经过选择和随机化,接受阴道子宫切除术的妇女分为第二组。A组在24h后拔除导尿管,b组在72h后拔除导尿管,记录观察结果并进行统计分析。结果:研究显示,导管使用时间不影响拔管后首次排尿时间(RR=.934)。6%的A组女性和2%的B组女性残尿量>200 ml,但B组残尿量明显高于B组(RR=0.714)。A组需要再次置管的患者为6%,B组为2% (RR= 3.000)。尿路感染(UTI)发生率B组明显高于A组(14%比2%)(RR= 0.143)。A组术后平均住院时间2.58 d, B组术后平均住院时间4.16 d (RR= 0.480)。结论:短期置管优于长期置管。因为它可以降低尿路感染的发生率,减少患者的不适,减少平均住院时间。Jcmcta 2021;32 (1): 83-88
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信