The running text is dead: inviting the reader to learn from a bullet-pointed peritext-patchwork textbook

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jannike Hegdal Nilssen, Jannike Hegdal, Nilssen
{"title":"The running text is dead: inviting the reader to learn from a bullet-pointed peritext-patchwork textbook","authors":"Jannike Hegdal Nilssen, Jannike Hegdal, Nilssen","doi":"10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the relationship between the running text and the many peritexts commonly found in newer textbooks, along with the associated consequences for textbased learning. The paper is a theo- retically driven case study that looks at the textual composition patterns in a language arts textbook for lower secondary schools in Norway. In particular, I investigate how these textual composition patterns facilitate learning from text — a main tool in the text analysis is comparing the signaled intentions in the text with the implied reader’s fulfil lment. The main finding of the study is that by enriching a textbook with many peritexts that contain essential content, one risks inviting the implied reader to employ a memorization strategy, even though the intention is to invite the implied reader to use deep-comprehension cognitive strategies. This is connected with the lack of running text. Without enough running text to synthesize the content, the running text appears dead, and rather than learning from the text, students are more likely to receive a memorization invitation from the text.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between the running text and the many peritexts commonly found in newer textbooks, along with the associated consequences for textbased learning. The paper is a theo- retically driven case study that looks at the textual composition patterns in a language arts textbook for lower secondary schools in Norway. In particular, I investigate how these textual composition patterns facilitate learning from text — a main tool in the text analysis is comparing the signaled intentions in the text with the implied reader’s fulfil lment. The main finding of the study is that by enriching a textbook with many peritexts that contain essential content, one risks inviting the implied reader to employ a memorization strategy, even though the intention is to invite the implied reader to use deep-comprehension cognitive strategies. This is connected with the lack of running text. Without enough running text to synthesize the content, the running text appears dead, and rather than learning from the text, students are more likely to receive a memorization invitation from the text.
连篇累牍的文本已经死了:它是在邀请读者从一种由文字拼凑而成的强调要点的教科书中学习
本研究调查了运行文本与新教科书中常见的许多文本之间的关系,以及基于文本的学习的相关后果。本文是一个理论驱动的案例研究,着眼于文本组成模式在语言艺术教科书在挪威的初中。特别地,我研究了这些篇章构成模式是如何促进从篇章中学习的——篇章分析的一个主要工具是比较篇章中暗示的意图和隐含的读者的实现。这项研究的主要发现是,用许多包含基本内容的上下文来丰富教科书,可能会导致隐含读者采用记忆策略,尽管其目的是让隐含读者使用深度理解认知策略。这与缺少运行文本有关。如果没有足够的运行文本来综合内容,运行文本就会显得僵死,而不是从文本中学习,学生更有可能收到文本的记忆邀请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信