EFFECT OF COMPOSITE ELASTICITY AND FILLER CONCENTRATION ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO DENTIN

H. Heshmat, G. Alavi, N. Mandana, A. Alavi
{"title":"EFFECT OF COMPOSITE ELASTICITY AND FILLER CONCENTRATION ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE TO DENTIN","authors":"H. Heshmat, G. Alavi, N. Mandana, A. Alavi","doi":"10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.43619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of problem: Resin composites are one of the most popular tooth colored restorative materials. Their enamel and dentin bonding ability are based on many factors, including elasticity and filler concentration. Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of volumetric filler percentage and modulus of elasticity of six composites by measuring shear bond strength to dentin of the bovine teeth as experimental bonding substrate. Materials and Methods: Eighty bovine incisors were prepared and divided into eight groups. Tetric Ceram, Tetric Flow, Compo glass F, Helimolar RO, Definite, and Degufill Mineral were applied respectively. A fifth generation of dentin bonding system [Single Bond (3M, USA)] was used for all the groups. The volumetric filler percentage of each composite was obtained from their specification data. The modulus of elasticity was determined, using the formula presented by Bream et al. (1986). Then, in last two groups Heliomolar RO and Definite were bonded using their own bonding systems, Syntac Multicomponent, and Definite Multibond. The shear bond strength was measured according to the ISO/TR 11405. Pearson’s correlation test was used to compare the result with groups 4 and 5. Results: The results indicated that the relationship between both the filler percentage and the modulus of elasticity with the shear strength was 16% (P<0.005). There was a significant difference between groups 4 and 7, but no significant difference was observed between groups 5 and 8. Conclusion: Using composites with a higher filler content and modulus of elasticity resulted in higher shear bond strength in dentin bonding system. Our results showed that the corresponding dentin bonding system of composites had better results.","PeriodicalId":15562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.43619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Statement of problem: Resin composites are one of the most popular tooth colored restorative materials. Their enamel and dentin bonding ability are based on many factors, including elasticity and filler concentration. Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of volumetric filler percentage and modulus of elasticity of six composites by measuring shear bond strength to dentin of the bovine teeth as experimental bonding substrate. Materials and Methods: Eighty bovine incisors were prepared and divided into eight groups. Tetric Ceram, Tetric Flow, Compo glass F, Helimolar RO, Definite, and Degufill Mineral were applied respectively. A fifth generation of dentin bonding system [Single Bond (3M, USA)] was used for all the groups. The volumetric filler percentage of each composite was obtained from their specification data. The modulus of elasticity was determined, using the formula presented by Bream et al. (1986). Then, in last two groups Heliomolar RO and Definite were bonded using their own bonding systems, Syntac Multicomponent, and Definite Multibond. The shear bond strength was measured according to the ISO/TR 11405. Pearson’s correlation test was used to compare the result with groups 4 and 5. Results: The results indicated that the relationship between both the filler percentage and the modulus of elasticity with the shear strength was 16% (P<0.005). There was a significant difference between groups 4 and 7, but no significant difference was observed between groups 5 and 8. Conclusion: Using composites with a higher filler content and modulus of elasticity resulted in higher shear bond strength in dentin bonding system. Our results showed that the corresponding dentin bonding system of composites had better results.
复合材料弹性及填料浓度对复合材料与牙本质剪切结合强度的影响
问题说明:树脂复合材料是最流行的牙齿彩色修复材料之一。牙釉质和牙本质的结合能力取决于许多因素,包括弹性和填料浓度。目的:通过测定牛牙与牙本质的剪切结合强度,评价六种复合材料的体积填充率和弹性模量的影响。材料与方法:制备牛门牙80只,分为8组。分别应用了电陶瓷、电流、复合玻璃F、Helimolar RO、Definite和Degufill Mineral。所有组均采用第五代牙本质粘接系统[Single Bond (3M, USA)]。每种复合材料的体积填充率由其规格数据获得。弹性模量的确定采用Bream et al.(1986)提出的公式。然后,在最后两组中,Heliomolar RO和Definite分别使用各自的键合体系Syntac Multicomponent和Definite Multibond进行键合。按ISO/TR 11405测定剪切粘结强度。采用Pearson相关检验将结果与第4、5组进行比较。结果:填料含量、弹性模量与抗剪强度的关系均为16% (P<0.005)。4、7组间差异有统计学意义,5、8组间差异无统计学意义。结论:采用高填充量、高弹性模量的复合材料可提高牙本质黏结系统的剪切强度。结果表明,复合材料的牙本质结合体系具有较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信