O16 PSSST!: Using a patient-specific simulated systems test (PSSST) to review system performance and latent safety risks when assessing and planning an individual patient-specific pathway, improving patient and hospital outcomes

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
F. Hanlon, E. Suckling, Rosie Fish
{"title":"O16 PSSST!: Using a patient-specific simulated systems test (PSSST) to review system performance and latent safety risks when assessing and planning an individual patient-specific pathway, improving patient and hospital outcomes","authors":"F. Hanlon, E. Suckling, Rosie Fish","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Simulated system tests can be used to address system errors, improve system performance, patient safety and quality of healthcare1,2. The University Hospitals Bristol and Weston Simulation Services (UHBW SS) adapted this simulation model to review the potential system performance of an individual patient pathway to improve patient outcome. Background Patient X is a 2-year old female with complex medical background, tracheostomy and posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytoma requiring 6-week radiotherapy course under general anaesthetic. The primary complicating factor for the patient and radiotherapy journey was brainstem dysfunction resulting in frequent breath holding spells, respiratory arrest and subsequent hypoxic cardiac arrest. Due to the high-risk nature of the patient, UHBW SS paediatric team designed and delivered a patient-specific simulated systems test (PSSST) simulating patient X’s intended radiotherapy pathway to identify and address latent safety threats. Methods We designed and delivered the PSSST using a basic, low-fidelity ‘walk-through’ simulation model, simulating each step of patient X’s radiotherapy journey. Staff involved in the patient’s care and radiotherapy treatment were present, including anaesthetic, general paediatric, HDU and nursing teams, paediatric critical care outreach, radiotherapy and hospital porters. We did not run simulated acute emergencies, instead adapted the use of reflective pauses, addressing anticipated complications at each stage of the journey. Issues identified were further discussed in a modified debrief following the simulation and action plans formulated. Members of the MDT were allocated tasks, with clear instructions and dates of when they were to be completed by prior to the radiotherapy course commencing. Examples of issues identified: Emergency equipment and staff required for transfer Need for personal protective equipment (PPE) in light of COVID–19 pandemic Environment familiarity for the patient to reduce risk of breath holding spells secondary to agitation/anxiety Results The PSSST of patient X’s radiotherapy pathway identified clinical and ethical implications on both the patient and wider hospital triggering further senior discussions prior to proceeding with her treatment. Latent safety threats were identified and addressed in a timely manner. As a result of this PSSST, patient X underwent an uneventful radiotherapy course without complication or adverse impact on the wider hospital. Discussion This exercise has identified how basic, low-fidelity simulated MDT system tests can be adapted to review system performance of an individual patient-specific pathway, improving patient and hospital outcomes. We aim to expand the use of PSSST for assessing and planning individual patient pathways in the future at BRHC. References Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK, et al. Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Annals of Surgery2004;239:475e82. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2010;19(Suppl 2):i34-i43.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Simulated system tests can be used to address system errors, improve system performance, patient safety and quality of healthcare1,2. The University Hospitals Bristol and Weston Simulation Services (UHBW SS) adapted this simulation model to review the potential system performance of an individual patient pathway to improve patient outcome. Background Patient X is a 2-year old female with complex medical background, tracheostomy and posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytoma requiring 6-week radiotherapy course under general anaesthetic. The primary complicating factor for the patient and radiotherapy journey was brainstem dysfunction resulting in frequent breath holding spells, respiratory arrest and subsequent hypoxic cardiac arrest. Due to the high-risk nature of the patient, UHBW SS paediatric team designed and delivered a patient-specific simulated systems test (PSSST) simulating patient X’s intended radiotherapy pathway to identify and address latent safety threats. Methods We designed and delivered the PSSST using a basic, low-fidelity ‘walk-through’ simulation model, simulating each step of patient X’s radiotherapy journey. Staff involved in the patient’s care and radiotherapy treatment were present, including anaesthetic, general paediatric, HDU and nursing teams, paediatric critical care outreach, radiotherapy and hospital porters. We did not run simulated acute emergencies, instead adapted the use of reflective pauses, addressing anticipated complications at each stage of the journey. Issues identified were further discussed in a modified debrief following the simulation and action plans formulated. Members of the MDT were allocated tasks, with clear instructions and dates of when they were to be completed by prior to the radiotherapy course commencing. Examples of issues identified: Emergency equipment and staff required for transfer Need for personal protective equipment (PPE) in light of COVID–19 pandemic Environment familiarity for the patient to reduce risk of breath holding spells secondary to agitation/anxiety Results The PSSST of patient X’s radiotherapy pathway identified clinical and ethical implications on both the patient and wider hospital triggering further senior discussions prior to proceeding with her treatment. Latent safety threats were identified and addressed in a timely manner. As a result of this PSSST, patient X underwent an uneventful radiotherapy course without complication or adverse impact on the wider hospital. Discussion This exercise has identified how basic, low-fidelity simulated MDT system tests can be adapted to review system performance of an individual patient-specific pathway, improving patient and hospital outcomes. We aim to expand the use of PSSST for assessing and planning individual patient pathways in the future at BRHC. References Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK, et al. Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Annals of Surgery2004;239:475e82. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2010;19(Suppl 2):i34-i43.
O16嘿,:在评估和规划单个患者特异性通路时,使用患者特异性模拟系统测试(PSSST)来审查系统性能和潜在的安全风险,从而改善患者和医院的结果
模拟系统测试可用于解决系统错误,提高系统性能,患者安全和医疗保健质量1,2。布里斯托尔大学医院和韦斯顿模拟服务(UHBW SS)采用这种模拟模型来审查单个患者途径的潜在系统性能,以改善患者的预后。患者X是一名2岁的女性,医学背景复杂,气管切开术和后窝毛细胞星形细胞瘤,需要全身麻醉下进行为期6周的放疗。患者和放疗过程的主要并发症因素是脑干功能障碍,导致频繁屏气,呼吸骤停和随后的缺氧性心脏骤停。由于患者的高风险性质,UHBW SS儿科团队设计并提供了患者特异性模拟系统测试(PSSST),模拟患者X的预期放疗路径,以识别和解决潜在的安全威胁。方法我们使用一个基本的、低保真的“walk-through”模拟模型来设计和交付PSSST,模拟X患者放疗过程的每一步。参与病人护理和放射治疗的工作人员在场,包括麻醉、普通儿科、HDU和护理小组、儿科重症护理外展、放射治疗和医院搬运工。我们没有模拟急性紧急情况,而是采用了反思暂停的方法,解决了旅程中每个阶段预期的并发症。在拟订模拟和行动计划后的订正汇报中进一步讨论了所查明的问题。MDT的成员被分配了任务,并有明确的指示和日期,何时在放射治疗课程开始之前完成。已确定的问题示例:转运所需的应急设备和工作人员鉴于COVID-19大流行,需要为患者提供个人防护装备(PPE),以减少继发于激动/焦虑的屏气症状的风险结果患者X放射治疗途径的PSSST确定了对患者和更广泛的医院的临床和伦理影响,引发了进一步的高级讨论,然后再进行治疗。及时发现并解决了潜在的安全威胁。由于该PSSST,患者X接受了平安无事的放射治疗过程,没有并发症或对更广泛的医院产生不利影响。本练习确定了基本的、低保真度的模拟MDT系统测试如何适用于评估单个患者特定途径的系统性能,从而改善患者和医院的结果。我们的目标是在未来BRHC中扩大PSSST在评估和规划个体患者路径方面的应用。Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK等。手术质量和安全的系统方法:从概念到测量。外科年鉴2004;239:457 - 582。刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,等。患者安全的培训和模拟。卫生保健质量和安全2010;19(补充2):i34-i43。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信