3. Realization of Quantities by Primary Standards Laboratories

{"title":"3. Realization of Quantities by Primary Standards Laboratories","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jicru_ndw037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In principle, both kerma and absorbed dose can be determined for any material at any energy. Given the considerations noted above regarding secondaryphoton contributions and charged-particle equilibrium (CPE), it is not surprising that the relationship between kerma and absorbed dose changes significantly with energy and material. Because of the very limited beam penetration and the relatively low absorbed-dose rates involved, absorbed dose is very difficult to realize directly for kilovoltage x rays, although a few water calorimeter standards have been developed (see, e.g., de Prez and de Pooter, 2008; Krauss et al., 2012; Rapp et al., 2013). Most primary standards for these radiations are based on kerma, in particular on the determination of the air kerma using a free-air ionization chamber. At Co g-ray energies, the need for CPE would require a prohibitively large free-air chamber, and cavity-ionization chambers are used as primary standards. In more recent years, the direct determination of absorbed dose by graphite and water calorimetry has produced standards with an overall uncertainty that matches, and in some cases reduces, that derived from a determination of air kerma. Nevertheless, air kerma for Co g rays remains a very important reference quantity, particularly for standards laboratories. At the high energies produced by particle accelerators, the determination of air kerma free in air in these beams is no longer used to determine absorbed dose. In more recent years, absorbed-dose standards at high energies have been used, either directly for instrument calibrations or more commonly to determine values for correction factors that convert an ionization-chamber absorbed-dose calibration for Co g rays for use at higher energies (McEwen, 2010; Seuntjens et al., 2000). Several review articles describing the standards used for radiation dosimetry have been published in a special issue of Metrologia (Sharpe, 2009).","PeriodicalId":91344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ICRU","volume":"16 1","pages":"15 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ICRU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_ndw037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In principle, both kerma and absorbed dose can be determined for any material at any energy. Given the considerations noted above regarding secondaryphoton contributions and charged-particle equilibrium (CPE), it is not surprising that the relationship between kerma and absorbed dose changes significantly with energy and material. Because of the very limited beam penetration and the relatively low absorbed-dose rates involved, absorbed dose is very difficult to realize directly for kilovoltage x rays, although a few water calorimeter standards have been developed (see, e.g., de Prez and de Pooter, 2008; Krauss et al., 2012; Rapp et al., 2013). Most primary standards for these radiations are based on kerma, in particular on the determination of the air kerma using a free-air ionization chamber. At Co g-ray energies, the need for CPE would require a prohibitively large free-air chamber, and cavity-ionization chambers are used as primary standards. In more recent years, the direct determination of absorbed dose by graphite and water calorimetry has produced standards with an overall uncertainty that matches, and in some cases reduces, that derived from a determination of air kerma. Nevertheless, air kerma for Co g rays remains a very important reference quantity, particularly for standards laboratories. At the high energies produced by particle accelerators, the determination of air kerma free in air in these beams is no longer used to determine absorbed dose. In more recent years, absorbed-dose standards at high energies have been used, either directly for instrument calibrations or more commonly to determine values for correction factors that convert an ionization-chamber absorbed-dose calibration for Co g rays for use at higher energies (McEwen, 2010; Seuntjens et al., 2000). Several review articles describing the standards used for radiation dosimetry have been published in a special issue of Metrologia (Sharpe, 2009).
3.初级标准实验室量的实现
原则上,对于任何能量的任何物质,可玛和吸收剂量都可以测定。考虑到上述关于二次光子贡献和带电粒子平衡(CPE)的考虑,kerma和吸收剂量之间的关系随着能量和物质的变化而显著变化就不足为奇了。由于光束穿透非常有限,所涉及的吸收剂量率相对较低,因此很难直接实现千伏x射线的吸收剂量,尽管已经制定了一些水量热计标准(例如,见de Prez和de Pooter, 2008;Krauss等人,2012;Rapp et al., 2013)。这些辐射的大多数主要标准是基于克尔玛,特别是使用自由空气电离室测定空气克尔玛。在Co射线能量下,对CPE的需求将需要一个大得令人望而却步的自由空气室,而空腔电离室被用作主要标准。近年来,用石墨和水量热法直接测定吸收剂量所产生的标准,其总体不确定度与空气热值测定所产生的不确定度相当,在某些情况下甚至有所降低。尽管如此,对于一氧化碳射线,空气温度仍然是一个非常重要的参考量,特别是对于标准实验室。在粒子加速器产生的高能量下,这些光束中空气中游离空气克尔玛的测定不再用于测定吸收剂量。近年来,高能量吸收剂量标准已被直接用于仪器校准,或更常见地用于确定校正因子的值,这些校正因子将电离室吸收剂量校准的Co g射线转换为高能量使用(McEwen, 2010;Seuntjens et al., 2000)。《计量学》(Sharpe, 2009)的特刊上发表了几篇描述辐射剂量学标准的评论文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书