1Mbps is enough: Video quality and individual idiosyncrasies in multiparty HD video-conferencing

Marwin Schmitt, J. Redi, Pablo César, D. Bulterman
{"title":"1Mbps is enough: Video quality and individual idiosyncrasies in multiparty HD video-conferencing","authors":"Marwin Schmitt, J. Redi, Pablo César, D. Bulterman","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most video platforms deliver HD video in high bitrate encoding. Modern video-conferencing systems are capable of handling HD streams, but using multiparty conferencing, average internet connections in the home are on their bandwidth limit. For properly managing the encoding bitrate in videoconferencing, we must know what is the minimum bitrate requirement to provide users an acceptable experience, and what is the bitrate level after which QoE saturates?. Most available subjective studies in this area used rather dated technologies. We report on a multiparty study on video quality with HD resolution. We tested different encoding bitrates (256kbs, 1024kbs and 4096kbs) and packet loss rates (0, 0.5%) in groups of 4 participants with a scenario based on the ITU building blocks task. We discuss the influence of group interaction and individual idiosyncrasies based on different mixed models, and look at covariates engagement and enjoyment as further explanatory factors. We found that 256kbs is still sufficient to provide a fair overall experience, but video quality is noticed to be poor. On the higher bitrate end, most people will not perceive the difference between 1024kbs and 4096kbs, considering in both cases the quality to be close to excellent. Independent on bitrate, packet loss has a small but significant impact, quantifiable in, on average, less than half a point difference on a 5-point ITU scale.","PeriodicalId":6645,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Most video platforms deliver HD video in high bitrate encoding. Modern video-conferencing systems are capable of handling HD streams, but using multiparty conferencing, average internet connections in the home are on their bandwidth limit. For properly managing the encoding bitrate in videoconferencing, we must know what is the minimum bitrate requirement to provide users an acceptable experience, and what is the bitrate level after which QoE saturates?. Most available subjective studies in this area used rather dated technologies. We report on a multiparty study on video quality with HD resolution. We tested different encoding bitrates (256kbs, 1024kbs and 4096kbs) and packet loss rates (0, 0.5%) in groups of 4 participants with a scenario based on the ITU building blocks task. We discuss the influence of group interaction and individual idiosyncrasies based on different mixed models, and look at covariates engagement and enjoyment as further explanatory factors. We found that 256kbs is still sufficient to provide a fair overall experience, but video quality is noticed to be poor. On the higher bitrate end, most people will not perceive the difference between 1024kbs and 4096kbs, considering in both cases the quality to be close to excellent. Independent on bitrate, packet loss has a small but significant impact, quantifiable in, on average, less than half a point difference on a 5-point ITU scale.
1Mbps就足够了:多方高清视频会议的视频质量和个人特性
大多数视频平台以高比特率编码提供高清视频。现代视频会议系统能够处理高清数据流,但使用多方会议时,家庭的平均互联网连接受到带宽限制。为了正确管理视频会议中的编码比特率,我们必须知道为用户提供可接受的体验所需的最小比特率是多少,以及QoE饱和的比特率是多少。在这一领域,大多数现有的主观研究都使用了相当过时的技术。我们报告了一项关于高清分辨率视频质量的多方研究。我们测试了不同的编码比特率(256kbs、1024kbs和4096kbs)和丢包率(0,0.5%),每组4人,基于ITU构建块任务的场景。我们基于不同的混合模型讨论了群体互动和个人特质的影响,并将协变量参与度和享受作为进一步的解释因素。我们发现256kbs仍然足以提供公平的整体体验,但视频质量很差。在比特率较高的一端,大多数人不会感觉到1024kbs和4096kbs之间的差异,因为在这两种情况下,质量都接近优秀。在不考虑比特率的情况下,丢包的影响虽小但意义重大,在ITU的5分制中,丢包的影响平均不到0.5分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信