Economics of Subsistence Farming: A Comparative Analysis of Paddy-wheat and Maize-wheat Rotation Cropping System in Himachal Pradesh

Smriti ., A. K. Basantaray
{"title":"Economics of Subsistence Farming: A Comparative Analysis of Paddy-wheat and Maize-wheat Rotation Cropping System in Himachal Pradesh","authors":"Smriti ., A. K. Basantaray","doi":"10.18805/ag.r-2600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Marginalisation of Indian agriculture, due to increase in marginal and small agricultural households, brings the focus back on subsistence agriculture. Among other things, understanding the economics of subsistence agriculture will go a long way in making its practice viable by making sure the help that these subsistence farmers need are provided. Therefore, the present study attempts to study the economics of paddy-wheat and maize-wheat rotation cropping system practiced by subsistence farmers of Himachal Pradesh whose agriculture sector is known for its diversification towards high value crops. Methods: The study has used survey data collected from 60 randomly selected households from Rait block of district Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. 30 households practicing paddy-wheat rotating cultivation are selected from Boh and Drini village and 30 households doing Maize-Wheat rotating cultivation are from Machhlini, Panjol, Khridi, Rulede and Lahri village. The study is based on primary data which has been collected through a pre-tested schedule. Using the primary data, we have brought out factors other than self-consumption needs that determines choice between two farming systems and also two group of farmers are compared in terms of productivity, cost of cultivation and net returns from cultivation. Result: Our study found that irrigation facilities play an important role in the choice between the two cropping systems. Return from cultivation is negative for both groups of farmers if imputed value of family labour is included. Performance of paddy-wheat farmers is significantly better than maize-wheat farmers in economic terms in the study area.\n","PeriodicalId":7417,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Reviews","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Marginalisation of Indian agriculture, due to increase in marginal and small agricultural households, brings the focus back on subsistence agriculture. Among other things, understanding the economics of subsistence agriculture will go a long way in making its practice viable by making sure the help that these subsistence farmers need are provided. Therefore, the present study attempts to study the economics of paddy-wheat and maize-wheat rotation cropping system practiced by subsistence farmers of Himachal Pradesh whose agriculture sector is known for its diversification towards high value crops. Methods: The study has used survey data collected from 60 randomly selected households from Rait block of district Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. 30 households practicing paddy-wheat rotating cultivation are selected from Boh and Drini village and 30 households doing Maize-Wheat rotating cultivation are from Machhlini, Panjol, Khridi, Rulede and Lahri village. The study is based on primary data which has been collected through a pre-tested schedule. Using the primary data, we have brought out factors other than self-consumption needs that determines choice between two farming systems and also two group of farmers are compared in terms of productivity, cost of cultivation and net returns from cultivation. Result: Our study found that irrigation facilities play an important role in the choice between the two cropping systems. Return from cultivation is negative for both groups of farmers if imputed value of family labour is included. Performance of paddy-wheat farmers is significantly better than maize-wheat farmers in economic terms in the study area.
自给农业经济学:喜马偕尔邦稻田-小麦和玉米-小麦轮作制度比较分析
背景:由于边缘和小型农业家庭的增加,印度农业的边缘化使人们重新关注自给农业。除其他事项外,了解自给农业的经济学将大大有助于使其实践可行,确保向这些自给农民提供所需的帮助。因此,本研究试图研究喜马偕尔邦自给农民实行的水稻-小麦和玉米-小麦轮作制度的经济学,喜马偕尔邦的农业部门以向高价值作物多样化而闻名。方法:在喜马恰尔邦康格拉区Rait街区随机抽取60户调查数据,选取Boh村和Drini村稻麦轮作农户30户,Machhlini村、Panjol村、Khridi村、Rulede村和Lahri村轮作玉米小麦农户30户。这项研究是基于通过预先测试的时间表收集的原始数据。利用原始数据,我们提出了决定两种耕作制度之间选择的自我消费需求以外的因素,并在生产力、种植成本和种植净收益方面比较了两组农民。结果:灌溉设施对两种种植制度的选择起着重要作用。如果包括家庭劳动的估算价值,两组农民的耕作回报均为负。研究区稻麦农户的经济效益显著优于玉米小麦农户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信