Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase

IF 1.9 3区 数学 Q2 Mathematics
O. Cots, J. Gergaud, D. Goubinat, B. Wembe
{"title":"Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase","authors":"O. Cots, J. Gergaud, D. Goubinat, B. Wembe","doi":"10.1051/m2an/2022101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we are interested in optimal aircraft trajectories in climbing phase. We consider the cost index criterion which is a convex combination of the time-to-climb and the fuel consumption. We assume that the thrust is constant and we control the air slope of the aircraft. This optimization problem is modeled as a Mayer optimal control problem with a single-input affine dynamics in the control and with two pure state constraints, limiting the Calibrated AirSpeed (CAS) and the Mach speed. The candidates as minimizers are selected among a set of extremals given by the maximum principle. We first analyze the minimum time-to-climb problem with respect to the bounds of the state constraints, combining small time analysis, indirect multiple shooting and homotopy methods with monitoring. This investigation emphasizes two strategies: the common CAS/Mach procedure in aeronautics and the classical Bang-Singular-Bang policy in control theory. We then compare these two procedures for the cost index criterion.","PeriodicalId":50499,"journal":{"name":"Esaim-Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis-Modelisation Mathematique et Analyse Numerique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esaim-Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis-Modelisation Mathematique et Analyse Numerique","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2022101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we are interested in optimal aircraft trajectories in climbing phase. We consider the cost index criterion which is a convex combination of the time-to-climb and the fuel consumption. We assume that the thrust is constant and we control the air slope of the aircraft. This optimization problem is modeled as a Mayer optimal control problem with a single-input affine dynamics in the control and with two pure state constraints, limiting the Calibrated AirSpeed (CAS) and the Mach speed. The candidates as minimizers are selected among a set of extremals given by the maximum principle. We first analyze the minimum time-to-climb problem with respect to the bounds of the state constraints, combining small time analysis, indirect multiple shooting and homotopy methods with monitoring. This investigation emphasizes two strategies: the common CAS/Mach procedure in aeronautics and the classical Bang-Singular-Bang policy in control theory. We then compare these two procedures for the cost index criterion.
爬升阶段飞机轨迹优化的奇异弧与边界弧
在本文中,我们感兴趣的是飞机爬升阶段的最优轨迹。考虑了爬升时间和燃油消耗的凸组合成本指标准则。我们假设推力是恒定的,我们控制飞机的气流斜率。该优化问题被建模为一个Mayer最优控制问题,在控制中具有单输入仿射动力学,并具有两个纯状态约束,限制了校准空速(CAS)和马赫速度。作为最小值的候选者是从由极大值原理给出的一组极值中选出的。我们首先结合小时间分析、间接多次射击和同伦方法与监测相结合,根据状态约束的边界分析了最小爬升时间问题。本文着重研究了两种策略:航空学中常用的CAS/Mach程序和控制理论中经典的bang - singularity - bang策略。然后,我们比较这两种程序的成本指数标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: M2AN publishes original research papers of high scientific quality in two areas: Mathematical Modelling, and Numerical Analysis. Mathematical Modelling comprises the development and study of a mathematical formulation of a problem. Numerical Analysis comprises the formulation and study of a numerical approximation or solution approach to a mathematically formulated problem. Papers should be of interest to researchers and practitioners that value both rigorous theoretical analysis and solid evidence of computational relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信