Theoretical-conceptual aspects regarding the entitlement of the legal field concerned by the protection of environmental factors

The National law journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).06

Andrian Creţu

{"title":"Theoretical-conceptual aspects regarding the entitlement of the legal field concerned by the protection of environmental factors","authors":"Andrian Creţu","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate knowledge of the scope of a field or branches of law is an indispensable condition for the evolution of any branch of the legal system. This is also the case with environmental law. Despite the various debates on the correct name of the branch concerned with the protection of environmental factors, launched in the doctrinal space since its inception, today more and more specialists in the field use the phrase “environmental law” when referring to legal relations established during protection environmental protection, development, conservation and rational use of all environmental components, including anthropogenic ones. However, there is currently some controversy regarding the certainty of the legal segment of concern for the field of environmental law, often being confused with that of ecology science, superimposed even at the level of scientific and didactic approach. For this reason, we decided to end the discussions that further complicate matters, trying to show that ecology and the environment, respectively, environmental law are distinct areas, although very close, correlated and coexisting in the legal system.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of the scope of a field or branches of law is an indispensable condition for the evolution of any branch of the legal system. This is also the case with environmental law. Despite the various debates on the correct name of the branch concerned with the protection of environmental factors, launched in the doctrinal space since its inception, today more and more specialists in the field use the phrase “environmental law” when referring to legal relations established during protection environmental protection, development, conservation and rational use of all environmental components, including anthropogenic ones. However, there is currently some controversy regarding the certainty of the legal segment of concern for the field of environmental law, often being confused with that of ecology science, superimposed even at the level of scientific and didactic approach. For this reason, we decided to end the discussions that further complicate matters, trying to show that ecology and the environment, respectively, environmental law are distinct areas, although very close, correlated and coexisting in the legal system.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于权利保护的理论概念方面是法律领域关注的环境因素

对某一领域或法律分支的范围有准确的认识是任何法律体系分支发展的必要条件。环境法也是如此。尽管自环境因素保护学科成立以来，在理论领域就其正确名称展开了各种辩论，但今天，该领域越来越多的专家在提到保护环境、开发、养护和合理利用包括人为因素在内的所有环境组成部分期间建立的法律关系时，使用“环境法”一词。然而，目前关于环境法领域所关注的法律部分的确定性存在一些争议，经常与生态科学的法律部分混淆，甚至在科学和教学方法的层面上重叠。因此，我们决定结束那些使问题进一步复杂化的讨论，试图表明生态和环境，分别是环境法的不同领域，虽然在法律体系中非常密切，相互关联，并存。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The National law journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量