Euphemistic strategies in Algerian Arabic and American English

Q2 Arts and Humanities
ExELL Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.2478/exell-2022-0004
Sharif Alghazo, Soumia Bekaddour, Marwan Jarrah, Yazeed M. Hammouri
{"title":"Euphemistic strategies in Algerian Arabic and American English","authors":"Sharif Alghazo, Soumia Bekaddour, Marwan Jarrah, Yazeed M. Hammouri","doi":"10.2478/exell-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to explore the use of euphemistic strategies by Algerians and Americans when dealing with three unpleasant topics: death, lying, and disease. It also examines the effect of degree of formality on the use of euphemistic strategies. To achieve this objective, a discourse completion task (DCT) was distributed to 21 Algerians and 21 Americans. The data were analysed using SPSS. The data analysis revealed that there are some differences and similarities between the two groups. The euphemistic strategies used by the Americans when they deal with death topics are synonyms and part for the whole. The Algerians use part for the whole, overstatement, and synonyms when they deal with death. Regarding the topic of lying, the Americans employ strategies of understatement and deletion, whereas the Algerians use understatement and metaphor. As for the topic of disease, the Americans use vagueness, and the Algerians use vagueness, metaphor, and deletion. These findings reveal that both groups resort to euphemism when dealing with these three unpleasant topics. However, their use of euphemistic strategies is culture-bound.","PeriodicalId":37072,"journal":{"name":"ExELL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ExELL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2022-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to explore the use of euphemistic strategies by Algerians and Americans when dealing with three unpleasant topics: death, lying, and disease. It also examines the effect of degree of formality on the use of euphemistic strategies. To achieve this objective, a discourse completion task (DCT) was distributed to 21 Algerians and 21 Americans. The data were analysed using SPSS. The data analysis revealed that there are some differences and similarities between the two groups. The euphemistic strategies used by the Americans when they deal with death topics are synonyms and part for the whole. The Algerians use part for the whole, overstatement, and synonyms when they deal with death. Regarding the topic of lying, the Americans employ strategies of understatement and deletion, whereas the Algerians use understatement and metaphor. As for the topic of disease, the Americans use vagueness, and the Algerians use vagueness, metaphor, and deletion. These findings reveal that both groups resort to euphemism when dealing with these three unpleasant topics. However, their use of euphemistic strategies is culture-bound.
阿尔及利亚阿拉伯语和美国英语的委婉语策略
本研究旨在探讨阿尔及利亚人和美国人在处理三个令人不快的话题:死亡、撒谎和疾病时使用委婉语的策略。本文还探讨了正式程度对委婉语策略使用的影响。为了实现这一目标,对21名阿尔及利亚人和21名美国人进行了话语完成任务(DCT)。数据采用SPSS统计软件进行分析。数据分析显示,两组之间存在一些差异和相似之处。美国人在处理死亡话题时使用的委婉策略是同义词和整体分离。阿尔及利亚人在处理死亡时用部分代替整体、夸大和同义词。对于说谎的话题,美国人采用轻描淡写和删减的策略,而阿尔及利亚人则采用轻描淡写和隐喻的策略。对于疾病的话题,美国人使用模糊,阿尔及利亚人使用模糊、隐喻和删除。这些发现表明,在处理这三个令人不快的话题时,两组人都使用委婉语。然而,他们对委婉语策略的使用是受文化限制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ExELL
ExELL Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信