Bridging the polarization gap: Maximizing diffusion among dissimilar communities

Marcin Waniek, César A. Hidalgo
{"title":"Bridging the polarization gap: Maximizing diffusion among dissimilar communities","authors":"Marcin Waniek, César A. Hidalgo","doi":"10.1177/26339137221128542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polarized networks, composed of weakly connected and self-reinforcing groups, can limit the diffusion of ideas, behaviors, and innovations. Here, we use a complex contagion model, in which diffusion depends on both the connectivity and the similarity of individuals, to ask how to optimally build bridges and enhance diffusion in networks characterized by fragmentation and homophily. First, we show that the problem is NP-hard. Then, we explore the space of solutions using heuristics, finding that connecting high degree nodes, or hubs, is an ineffective strategy to accelerate diffusion in fragmented and homophilous networks. We show that in these networks, diffusion is more effectively accelerated by connecting similar but low degree nodes. These results tell us that, in the presence of homophily and polarization, connecting communities through their most central actors may impede rather than facilitate diffusion. Instead, strategies to accelerate the diffusion of innovation, behaviors, and ideas should focus on creating links among the most similar members of different communities. These findings shed light on the diffusion of ideas and innovations in polarized networks. CCS Concepts: • Mathematics of computing → Network optimization; • Information systems → Social networks","PeriodicalId":93948,"journal":{"name":"Collective intelligence","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221128542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polarized networks, composed of weakly connected and self-reinforcing groups, can limit the diffusion of ideas, behaviors, and innovations. Here, we use a complex contagion model, in which diffusion depends on both the connectivity and the similarity of individuals, to ask how to optimally build bridges and enhance diffusion in networks characterized by fragmentation and homophily. First, we show that the problem is NP-hard. Then, we explore the space of solutions using heuristics, finding that connecting high degree nodes, or hubs, is an ineffective strategy to accelerate diffusion in fragmented and homophilous networks. We show that in these networks, diffusion is more effectively accelerated by connecting similar but low degree nodes. These results tell us that, in the presence of homophily and polarization, connecting communities through their most central actors may impede rather than facilitate diffusion. Instead, strategies to accelerate the diffusion of innovation, behaviors, and ideas should focus on creating links among the most similar members of different communities. These findings shed light on the diffusion of ideas and innovations in polarized networks. CCS Concepts: • Mathematics of computing → Network optimization; • Information systems → Social networks
弥合两极分化差距:在不同社区之间最大限度地扩散
两极分化的网络,由弱连接和自我强化的群体组成,可以限制思想、行为和创新的传播。在这里,我们使用一个复杂的传染模型,其中扩散取决于个体的连通性和相似性,来询问如何在以碎片化和同质性为特征的网络中最佳地建立桥梁并增强扩散。首先,我们证明这个问题是np困难的。然后,我们使用启发式方法探索了解决方案的空间,发现在碎片化和同质网络中,连接高节点或枢纽是加速扩散的无效策略。我们表明,在这些网络中,通过连接相似但低度的节点,可以更有效地加速扩散。这些结果告诉我们,在同质性和两极分化存在的情况下,通过最核心的行动者将社区联系起来可能会阻碍而不是促进传播。相反,加速创新、行为和思想传播的策略应该侧重于在不同社区中最相似的成员之间建立联系。这些发现揭示了思想和创新在两极分化网络中的传播。CCS概念:•计算数学→网络优化;•信息系统→社会网络
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信