Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara

Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849

I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Karisha HS. Ashari

{"title":"Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara","authors":"I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Karisha HS. Ashari","doi":"10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% on total bacterial count after mouth rinsing at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique was applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 3 groups and each consisting of 12 people. Normal saline 0.9% was used as control group while chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% was used as the treatment group. Each member performed mouth rinsing for 30 seconds. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and MannWhitney test. The comparison between chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count after mouth rinsing (p<0.05) and the chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% group showed a greater mean reduction. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% reduce more bacteria than povidone iodine 1%. However, both of the antiseptic agents can be a choice for mouth rinsing. Keyword: Bacteria colonization, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Mouth rinsing, Povidone iodine Cite this Article: Isnandar, Rusdy H, Siregar IB, Ashari KHS. 2021. Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i1.849 Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Isnandar,* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari","PeriodicalId":31119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% on total bacterial count after mouth rinsing at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique was applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 3 groups and each consisting of 12 people. Normal saline 0.9% was used as control group while chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% was used as the treatment group. Each member performed mouth rinsing for 30 seconds. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and MannWhitney test. The comparison between chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count after mouth rinsing (p<0.05) and the chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% group showed a greater mean reduction. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% reduce more bacteria than povidone iodine 1%. However, both of the antiseptic agents can be a choice for mouth rinsing. Keyword: Bacteria colonization, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Mouth rinsing, Povidone iodine Cite this Article: Isnandar, Rusdy H, Siregar IB, Ashari KHS. 2021. Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i1.849 Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Isnandar,* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari

查看原文本刊更多论文

苏门答腊北原大学口腔外科口腔外科0、12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘作为无菌技术对细菌总数的影响

目的:比较0.12%的二光酸氯己定与1%的聚维酮碘在苏门答腊岛北坂大学口腔外科口腔冲洗后细菌总数的差异。材料与方法:采用后验对照组设计方法。采用目的技术采集临床学生样本。在本研究中，样本被分为3组，每组12人。以0.9%生理盐水为对照组，0.12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘为治疗组。每位成员漱口30秒。结果:采用Kruskal Wallis检验和MannWhitney检验对结果进行统计学分析。0.12%二光酸氯己定与1%聚维酮碘漱口后细菌总数差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)， 0.12%二光酸氯己定漱口后细菌总数减少幅度更大。结论:二光酸氯己定0.12%比聚维酮碘1%的抑菌效果好。然而，这两种抗菌剂都可以作为漱口的选择。关键词:细菌定植，二光酸氯己定，漱口水，聚维酮碘2021. 苏门答腊北原大学口腔外科口腔外科0、12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘作为无菌技术对细菌总数的影响牙颌面科学杂志，6(1):42-44。DOI: 10.15562/jdmf .v6i1.849在苏门答腊Utara Isnandar大学口腔外科，牙科学院，* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari，用无菌技术冲洗二光酸氯己定0,12%和聚维酮碘1%对细菌总数的影响

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊