Diagnosis of sepsis in dogs by measuring carbonylated proteins (PCOs) and paraoxonase (PON-1)

B. Ruggerone, R. Troìa, E. Murgia, M. Giunti, F. Dondi, S. Paltrinieri
{"title":"Diagnosis of sepsis in dogs by measuring carbonylated proteins (PCOs) and paraoxonase (PON-1)","authors":"B. Ruggerone, R. Troìa, E. Murgia, M. Giunti, F. Dondi, S. Paltrinieri","doi":"10.13130/2283-3927/10011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An early diagnosis of sepsis could allow a better prognosis and avoid the abuse of antibiotic administration; unfortunately, in veterinary medicine, specific and sensitive markers of sepsis are not available.Because Protein Carbonyls (PCOs), that result from protein oxidation, are widely used in human medicine as sepsis markers , the aim of our study was to validate an ELISA kit (Enzolifesciences, 3V Chimica, Roma) on canine serum and to measure PCOs, after a preliminary validation study, in three groups (homogeneous for age and size): healthy dogs without clinical or laboratory abnormalities (A, n=14), dogs with septic (B, n=14) and non-septic inflammation (C, n=12) at the first presentation and without previous treatments. Moreover, Paraoxonase-1, a negative acute phase protein with anti-oxidant properties (PON-1) was measured in each group with a method already validated in dogs.A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate differences between groups.The ELISA method for measuring PCOs showed a very good precision (coefficient of variation <12%) and a good accuracy in spiking-recovery tests.Compared with controls, the concentration of PCOs was significantly higher either in dogs with sepsis (P<0.001) or in dogs with non-septic inflammation (P=0.005) but no significant differences were found between the two groups of sick dogs. Conversely, PON-1 was significantly lower in sick dogs compared with controls (P<0.001 for both groups) and in septic dogs compared with dogs with non-septic inflammation (P=0.001).A negative correlation between the two markers was found (P<0.001, r=-0.594) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that both markers may discriminate dogs with sepsis with the other groups. However, PCO was less sensitive than PON-1 in diagnosing sepsis.Future studies should be focused on the association of PCOs with other inflammatory markers, as well as the possible prognostic role of PCOs based on the outcome of the enrolled patients.","PeriodicalId":14105,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health, Animal science and Food safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health, Animal science and Food safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2283-3927/10011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

An early diagnosis of sepsis could allow a better prognosis and avoid the abuse of antibiotic administration; unfortunately, in veterinary medicine, specific and sensitive markers of sepsis are not available.Because Protein Carbonyls (PCOs), that result from protein oxidation, are widely used in human medicine as sepsis markers , the aim of our study was to validate an ELISA kit (Enzolifesciences, 3V Chimica, Roma) on canine serum and to measure PCOs, after a preliminary validation study, in three groups (homogeneous for age and size): healthy dogs without clinical or laboratory abnormalities (A, n=14), dogs with septic (B, n=14) and non-septic inflammation (C, n=12) at the first presentation and without previous treatments. Moreover, Paraoxonase-1, a negative acute phase protein with anti-oxidant properties (PON-1) was measured in each group with a method already validated in dogs.A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate differences between groups.The ELISA method for measuring PCOs showed a very good precision (coefficient of variation <12%) and a good accuracy in spiking-recovery tests.Compared with controls, the concentration of PCOs was significantly higher either in dogs with sepsis (P<0.001) or in dogs with non-septic inflammation (P=0.005) but no significant differences were found between the two groups of sick dogs. Conversely, PON-1 was significantly lower in sick dogs compared with controls (P<0.001 for both groups) and in septic dogs compared with dogs with non-septic inflammation (P=0.001).A negative correlation between the two markers was found (P<0.001, r=-0.594) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that both markers may discriminate dogs with sepsis with the other groups. However, PCO was less sensitive than PON-1 in diagnosing sepsis.Future studies should be focused on the association of PCOs with other inflammatory markers, as well as the possible prognostic role of PCOs based on the outcome of the enrolled patients.
测定羰基化蛋白(PCOs)和对氧磷酶(PON-1)对犬脓毒症的诊断价值
败血症的早期诊断可以获得更好的预后,避免滥用抗生素;不幸的是,在兽医学中,没有特异性和敏感的败血症标志物。由于蛋白质氧化产生的蛋白羰基(PCOs)在人类医学中广泛用作败血症标志物,因此我们研究的目的是在犬血清上验证ELISA试剂盒(Enzolifesciences, 3V Chimica, Roma),并在经过初步验证研究后,在三组(年龄和体型相同)中测量PCOs:无临床或实验室异常的健康犬(A, n=14),首次出现且未接受治疗的脓毒性炎症(B, n=14)和非脓毒性炎症(C, n=12)。此外,采用已经在狗身上验证的方法,在每组中测量具有抗氧化特性的阴性急性期蛋白对氧磷酶-1 (PON-1)。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验来评价组间差异。ELISA法测定PCOs具有很好的精密度(变异系数<12%),在加穗回收率试验中具有很好的准确度。与对照组相比,脓毒症犬(P<0.001)和非脓毒症炎症犬(P=0.005)的PCOs浓度均显著升高,但两组病犬之间无显著差异。相反,病犬的PON-1水平明显低于对照组(两组均P<0.001),脓毒症犬的PON-1水平明显低于非脓毒症犬(P=0.001)。两者呈负相关(P<0.001, r=-0.594)。受试者工作特征(Receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线显示两种指标均可与其他组区分脓毒症犬。但PCO对脓毒症的诊断敏感性低于PON-1。未来的研究应侧重于PCOs与其他炎症标志物的关联,以及PCOs基于入组患者的预后可能的预后作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信