{"title":"Effect of Fluid Loss Polymers Architecture on Cement Slurry Rheology : Impact of Adsorption and Microstructure","authors":"A. Cadix, V. Molinie, James Wilson","doi":"10.2118/193620-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Several polymer technologies are commonly used as fluid loss control additives. Working mechanisms were studied by Plank et al. (Plank et al. 2009) and most of the time these can be classified into 2 categories: adsorbing polymers and pore plugging \"microgel\" like systems. In addition, these polymers have a strong influence on the cement slurry rheology and are also often expected to play a role on cement particle suspension, cement sheath homogeneity and to prevent settling.\n The scope of this paper is to investigate the impact of several types of fluid loss polymers on cement slurry stability. Then, an effort is made to correlate the working mechanism of the fluid loss additive with cement slurry rheological behavior and its ability to prevent segregation or settling.\n On top of conventional tests on fluid loss and flow rheology, refined evaluations of the rheological behavior are performed in oscillatory rheometry at very-low strain. This technique allows some insight into the microscopic interactions at stake in cement slurries. In particular a \"yield stress model\" is applied to formulated oil well cement slurries at 90°C providing additional insight on the impact of adsorbing or non-adsorbing polymers.\n From this study it can be confirmed that adsorbing polymers have a strong impact on rheological properties with a surprisingly lower yield stress combined with improved slurry stability. On the other hand non adsorbing polymers of either linear or μgel form have a very limited impact on slurry yield stress and a variable impact on slurry stability through either viscosification of the interstitial fluid for linear polymers or enhanced settling hindrance from μgels.","PeriodicalId":10983,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193620-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Several polymer technologies are commonly used as fluid loss control additives. Working mechanisms were studied by Plank et al. (Plank et al. 2009) and most of the time these can be classified into 2 categories: adsorbing polymers and pore plugging "microgel" like systems. In addition, these polymers have a strong influence on the cement slurry rheology and are also often expected to play a role on cement particle suspension, cement sheath homogeneity and to prevent settling.
The scope of this paper is to investigate the impact of several types of fluid loss polymers on cement slurry stability. Then, an effort is made to correlate the working mechanism of the fluid loss additive with cement slurry rheological behavior and its ability to prevent segregation or settling.
On top of conventional tests on fluid loss and flow rheology, refined evaluations of the rheological behavior are performed in oscillatory rheometry at very-low strain. This technique allows some insight into the microscopic interactions at stake in cement slurries. In particular a "yield stress model" is applied to formulated oil well cement slurries at 90°C providing additional insight on the impact of adsorbing or non-adsorbing polymers.
From this study it can be confirmed that adsorbing polymers have a strong impact on rheological properties with a surprisingly lower yield stress combined with improved slurry stability. On the other hand non adsorbing polymers of either linear or μgel form have a very limited impact on slurry yield stress and a variable impact on slurry stability through either viscosification of the interstitial fluid for linear polymers or enhanced settling hindrance from μgels.
几种聚合物技术通常被用作防滤失添加剂。Plank等人(Plank et al. 2009)对其工作机理进行了研究,大多数情况下可将其分为两类:吸附聚合物和孔隙堵塞“微凝胶”类系统。此外,这些聚合物对水泥浆的流变性有很强的影响,也经常被期望在水泥颗粒悬浮、水泥环均匀性和防止沉降方面发挥作用。本文的研究范围是研究几种降滤失聚合物对水泥浆稳定性的影响。然后,努力将降滤失剂的工作机制与水泥浆流变行为及其防止离析或沉降的能力联系起来。在流体损失和流动流变的常规测试之上,在非常低的应变下,通过振荡流变法对流变行为进行了精细的评估。这项技术可以让我们深入了解水泥浆中的微观相互作用。特别是,“屈服应力模型”应用于90°C下的配方油井水泥浆,为吸附或非吸附聚合物的影响提供了额外的见解。从这项研究中可以证实,吸附聚合物对流变特性有很强的影响,具有令人惊讶的低屈服应力和提高浆体稳定性。另一方面,线性或μ凝胶形式的非吸附聚合物对浆体屈服应力的影响非常有限,而对浆体稳定性的影响则是可变的,这可能是由于线性聚合物对间隙流体的粘滞作用或μ凝胶对沉降阻碍的增强。