State participation in the development of high-tech industries as the basis for ensuring the technological sovereignty of the country

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
A. Polosin, D. Baydarov, D. Faikov
{"title":"State participation in the development of high-tech industries as the basis for ensuring the technological sovereignty of the country","authors":"A. Polosin, D. Baydarov, D. Faikov","doi":"10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-2-3-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is the author's assessment of the measures taken by the authorities aimed at the formation of technological sovereignty as part of a new economic and political model of society. The article is based on the principles of system analysis, the methods of factor analysis and logical modeling are also used. Based on the theoretical and empirical studies conducted, it is shown that technological sovereignty is a relatively new category, the study of which should be carried out at the intersection of political and economic sciences. In economic terms, technological sovereignty is based on the ability of the state to create critical, promising technologies and organize production based on them. It is revealed that the formation of technological sovereignty requires state participation in the economy. In particular, in such areas as planning technological and industrial development, identifying priority areas of research and production and forming a list of critical technologies, financing priority areas and projects, creating institutional conditions for technological development, protecting national researchers and manufacturers, developing science and education, etc. The analysis showed that currently work has begun in the country in almost all these areas, but most often not actively enough. It is concluded that these aspects of state participation can be represented as elements of an emerging new economic model that strengthens the regulatory role of the state in the economy, while preserving the basic principles and niches for market relations.","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-2-3-16","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this work is the author's assessment of the measures taken by the authorities aimed at the formation of technological sovereignty as part of a new economic and political model of society. The article is based on the principles of system analysis, the methods of factor analysis and logical modeling are also used. Based on the theoretical and empirical studies conducted, it is shown that technological sovereignty is a relatively new category, the study of which should be carried out at the intersection of political and economic sciences. In economic terms, technological sovereignty is based on the ability of the state to create critical, promising technologies and organize production based on them. It is revealed that the formation of technological sovereignty requires state participation in the economy. In particular, in such areas as planning technological and industrial development, identifying priority areas of research and production and forming a list of critical technologies, financing priority areas and projects, creating institutional conditions for technological development, protecting national researchers and manufacturers, developing science and education, etc. The analysis showed that currently work has begun in the country in almost all these areas, but most often not actively enough. It is concluded that these aspects of state participation can be represented as elements of an emerging new economic model that strengthens the regulatory role of the state in the economy, while preserving the basic principles and niches for market relations.
国家参与高新技术产业的发展,是保障国家技术主权的基础
这项工作的目的是作者对当局采取的措施进行评估,这些措施旨在形成技术主权,作为新的社会经济和政治模式的一部分。本文以系统分析的原理为基础,运用了因素分析和逻辑建模的方法。理论和实证研究表明,技术主权是一个相对较新的范畴,其研究应在政治科学和经济科学的交叉领域进行。从经济角度来看,技术主权是基于国家创造关键的、有前途的技术并以此为基础组织生产的能力。揭示了技术主权的形成需要国家对经济的参与。特别是在规划技术和工业发展、确定研究和生产的优先领域并形成关键技术清单、资助优先领域和项目、为技术发展创造体制条件、保护本国研究人员和制造商、发展科学和教育等方面。分析表明,目前该国几乎在所有这些领域都已开始工作,但大多数情况下还不够积极。结论是,国家参与的这些方面可以代表为新兴的新经济模式的要素,该模式加强了国家在经济中的调节作用,同时保留了市场关系的基本原则和利基。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信