Multiple arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting, Sohag University Hospital's initial experience

A.A.A. Elsayed , A.M. Boghdady , Khaled M. Abdelaal , E.A. Mokhtar , Ahmed Gaafar
{"title":"Multiple arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting, Sohag University Hospital's initial experience","authors":"A.A.A. Elsayed ,&nbsp;A.M. Boghdady ,&nbsp;Khaled M. Abdelaal ,&nbsp;E.A. Mokhtar ,&nbsp;Ahmed Gaafar","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2017.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is the most crucial step in any surgical coronary revascularization. It has been proved that using LIMA during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) resulted in better long term results in comparison to other conduits. With accumulation of data about failure and lower patency rates of vein grafts, the concept of total arterial revascularization (TAR) and multiple arterial revascularization (MAR) has developed to offer more physiological and durable conduits for CABG patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted in the <u>D</u>epartment of <u>C</u>ardiothoracic <u>S</u>urgery, Sohag University Hospital, Egypt, between January 2012 and January 2017. 104 patients who underwent CABG during the initial experience were involved. They were divided into 2 groups, group A (MAR) 46 patients, and Group B (Conventional CABG) 58 patients. Demographic data, <u>p</u>reoperative risk factors, operative and post operative details were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With almost comparable preoperative demographic distribution and risk factors, results were comparable regarding post operative MI, incidence of deep sternal wound infection, number of distal anastomoses, postoperative bleeding, and the need for blood transfusion. Cross clamp time and total bypass time were slightly longer in group A than in group B with statistically significant difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using multiple arterial grafts did not add a significant risk or time to the classic CABG. With accumulating evidence about better patency rate in arterial grafts, MAR is recommended especially in younger patients undergoing CABG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 306-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2017.10.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X17301669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is the most crucial step in any surgical coronary revascularization. It has been proved that using LIMA during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) resulted in better long term results in comparison to other conduits. With accumulation of data about failure and lower patency rates of vein grafts, the concept of total arterial revascularization (TAR) and multiple arterial revascularization (MAR) has developed to offer more physiological and durable conduits for CABG patients.

Methods

This study was conducted in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sohag University Hospital, Egypt, between January 2012 and January 2017. 104 patients who underwent CABG during the initial experience were involved. They were divided into 2 groups, group A (MAR) 46 patients, and Group B (Conventional CABG) 58 patients. Demographic data, preoperative risk factors, operative and post operative details were compared.

Results

With almost comparable preoperative demographic distribution and risk factors, results were comparable regarding post operative MI, incidence of deep sternal wound infection, number of distal anastomoses, postoperative bleeding, and the need for blood transfusion. Cross clamp time and total bypass time were slightly longer in group A than in group B with statistically significant difference.

Conclusions

Using multiple arterial grafts did not add a significant risk or time to the classic CABG. With accumulating evidence about better patency rate in arterial grafts, MAR is recommended especially in younger patients undergoing CABG.

多动脉移植在冠状动脉搭桥术中,苏海大学附属医院的初步经验
背景左内乳动脉(LIMA)移植至左前降支(LAD)是任何外科冠状动脉重建术中最关键的一步。已经证明,在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中使用LIMA比其他导管具有更好的长期效果。随着关于静脉移植失败和低通畅率的数据积累,全动脉血管重建术(TAR)和多动脉血管重建术(MAR)的概念已经发展,为CABG患者提供更多生理和持久的导管。方法本研究于2012年1月至2017年1月在埃及Sohag大学医院心胸外科进行。104名患者在最初的经历中接受了冠脉搭桥。分为两组,A组(MAR) 46例,B组(常规CABG) 58例。比较两组患者的人口学资料、术前危险因素、手术及术后细节。结果术前人口统计学分布和危险因素几乎相同,术后心肌梗死、胸骨深部伤口感染发生率、远端吻合口数量、术后出血和输血需求等方面的结果具有可比性。A组交叉钳夹时间、总旁路时间稍长于B组,差异有统计学意义。结论采用多根动脉移植物不会增加经典冠脉搭桥的风险或时间。随着越来越多的证据表明动脉移植物有更好的通畅率,特别是在接受CABG的年轻患者中,推荐使用MAR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信