Hut Existence or Urban Dwelling?

IF 1.7 2区社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES

Critical Asian Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.4312/as.2023.11.1.51-68

Mario Wenning

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heidegger’s “Creative Landscapes: Why do we remain in the provinces?” and “Dialogue on Language” reveal the importance of rootedness for his existentialism. The article engages with the provinciality of Heidegger’s thought by juxtaposing his solitary “hut existence” to Buddhist compassion and the urban aesthetics of Kuki Shūzō. Turning to the East allows for a deprovincialization of Heideggerian themes. The rich philosophical legacy of reflecting on intercultural modernization and urbanization processes in East Asian philosophical traditions presents a genuine opportunity to rethink what it means to dwell today.

查看原文本刊更多论文

生存还是城市居住?

海德格尔的《创造性景观:我们为什么停留在外省?》和《语言对话》揭示了“根”对其存在主义的重要性。本文通过将海德格尔孤独的“茅屋存在”与佛教的同情和Kuki Shūzō的城市美学并置，探讨了海德格尔思想的地方性。转向东方允许海德格尔主题的去地方化。在东亚哲学传统中，反思跨文化现代化和城市化进程的丰富哲学遗产为重新思考今天的生活意味着什么提供了真正的机会。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Asian Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Asian Studies is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that welcomes unsolicited essays, reviews, translations, interviews, photo essays, and letters about Asia and the Pacific, particularly those that challenge the accepted formulas for understanding the Asia and Pacific regions, the world, and ourselves. Published now by Routledge Journals, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, Critical Asian Studies remains true to the mission that was articulated for the journal in 1967 by the Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars.