Testing the Big Gods hypothesis with global historical data: a review and “retake”

IF 3.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
H. Whitehouse, Pieter François, Patrick E. Savage, D. Hoyer, K. C. Feeney, Enrico Cioni, Rosa S. Purcell, Jennifer Larson, J. Baines, B. Haar, A. Covey, P. Turchin
{"title":"Testing the Big Gods hypothesis with global historical data: a review and “retake”","authors":"H. Whitehouse, Pieter François, Patrick E. Savage, D. Hoyer, K. C. Feeney, Enrico Cioni, Rosa S. Purcell, Jennifer Larson, J. Baines, B. Haar, A. Covey, P. Turchin","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2022.2074085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This Retake article presents a corrected and extended version of a Letter published in Nature (Whitehouse et al., 2019) which set out to test the Big Gods hypothesis proposing that beliefs in moralizing punitive deities drove the evolution of sociopolitical complexity in world history. The Letter was retracted by the authors in response to a critique by Beheim et al. (2021). Correction of errors in the coding and analysis of missing data to address this critique does not, however, significantly change the main findings of the original Nature Letter. We report the results of a major reanalysis of Seshat data following expansion of the codebook and database and substantial improvements to our data management methods. We also employ a more direct statistical methodology to test theories of evolutionary causality. Together, these results show a compellingly convergent picture, confirming the headline finding of the original Letter in Nature, which shows that the largest increases in social complexity do indeed precede Big Gods in world history and that Big Gods did not contribute to the evolution of sociopolitical complexity as predicted by the Big Gods hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":"81 1","pages":"124 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion Brain & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2074085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Retake article presents a corrected and extended version of a Letter published in Nature (Whitehouse et al., 2019) which set out to test the Big Gods hypothesis proposing that beliefs in moralizing punitive deities drove the evolution of sociopolitical complexity in world history. The Letter was retracted by the authors in response to a critique by Beheim et al. (2021). Correction of errors in the coding and analysis of missing data to address this critique does not, however, significantly change the main findings of the original Nature Letter. We report the results of a major reanalysis of Seshat data following expansion of the codebook and database and substantial improvements to our data management methods. We also employ a more direct statistical methodology to test theories of evolutionary causality. Together, these results show a compellingly convergent picture, confirming the headline finding of the original Letter in Nature, which shows that the largest increases in social complexity do indeed precede Big Gods in world history and that Big Gods did not contribute to the evolution of sociopolitical complexity as predicted by the Big Gods hypothesis.
用全球历史数据检验大神假说:回顾与“重夺”
这篇Retake文章是对发表在《自然》(Whitehouse et al., 2019)上的一封信的更正和扩展版,该信旨在测试大神假说,该假说提出,对道德惩罚神的信仰推动了世界历史上社会政治复杂性的演变。在Beheim等人(2021)的批评下,作者撤回了这封信。然而,为了解决这一批评而纠正编码错误和分析缺失数据的错误并没有显著改变原始《自然快报》的主要发现。我们报告了在扩展代码本和数据库以及对我们的数据管理方法进行实质性改进之后对Seshat数据进行重大重新分析的结果。我们还采用更直接的统计方法来检验进化因果关系的理论。综上所述,这些结果显示了一幅令人信服的趋同图景,证实了《自然》原信的标题发现,即在世界历史上,社会复杂性的最大增长确实先于“大神”出现,而“大神”并没有像“大神”假说所预测的那样,对社会政治复杂性的演变做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
93
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信