Balance Impossible? Between Customizability and Comparability of Employee Satisfaction Surveys

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
C. Hartebrodt, Y. Chtioui
{"title":"Balance Impossible? Between Customizability and Comparability of Employee Satisfaction Surveys","authors":"C. Hartebrodt, Y. Chtioui","doi":"10.1515/aslh-2016-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a significant share of cases, when multi-objective management systems (e.g. Balanced Scorecard, Quantum Performance Measurement) are in use, the goal of employee satisfaction is part of the set of strategic goals. Quite frequently, this goal is flanked by an indicator, mostly a so-called employee satisfaction index, which is frequently derived from an employee satisfaction survey (ESS). On one hand such a survey has to reflect the characteristics and structure of the enterprises, on the other hand it is known that the question for intercompany-comparison turns up immediately after the disclosure of the results. The paper discusses the results of a meta-analysis of ESS in seven of the larger forest enterprises in Germany. The main topics are underlined and the problems of comparability of customized ESS are shown, while focusing on both wording and scales used for their measurement. A methodological approach of dealing with various scales is discussed based on the results of inter- and intra-company ESS. A vision of a common ESS framework is outlined.","PeriodicalId":53620,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aslh-2016-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In a significant share of cases, when multi-objective management systems (e.g. Balanced Scorecard, Quantum Performance Measurement) are in use, the goal of employee satisfaction is part of the set of strategic goals. Quite frequently, this goal is flanked by an indicator, mostly a so-called employee satisfaction index, which is frequently derived from an employee satisfaction survey (ESS). On one hand such a survey has to reflect the characteristics and structure of the enterprises, on the other hand it is known that the question for intercompany-comparison turns up immediately after the disclosure of the results. The paper discusses the results of a meta-analysis of ESS in seven of the larger forest enterprises in Germany. The main topics are underlined and the problems of comparability of customized ESS are shown, while focusing on both wording and scales used for their measurement. A methodological approach of dealing with various scales is discussed based on the results of inter- and intra-company ESS. A vision of a common ESS framework is outlined.
平衡不可能?员工满意度调查的可定制性与可比性
在很多情况下,当使用多目标管理系统(如平衡计分卡、量子绩效测量)时,员工满意度的目标是战略目标的一部分。通常,这个目标的两侧都有一个指标,主要是所谓的员工满意度指数,它通常来自员工满意度调查(ESS)。这样的调查一方面要反映企业的特点和结构,另一方面,众所周知,在结果披露后,公司间比较的问题就会立即出现。本文讨论了德国七家大型森林企业的ESS元分析结果。强调了主要主题,并显示了定制ESS的可比性问题,同时重点介绍了用于测量的措辞和尺度。基于公司内部和内部ESS的结果,讨论了处理各种尺度的方法方法。概述了通用ESS框架的远景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信