Of Self and Polity: Writing Resistance in Dixit’s Madhavi

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Komal Prasad Phuyal
{"title":"Of Self and Polity: Writing Resistance in Dixit’s Madhavi","authors":"Komal Prasad Phuyal","doi":"10.3126/litstud.v35i01.43673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Madan Mani Dixit’s novel Madhavi (1983) subtly argues for change in the existing rigid political order of his time by projecting self larger than the polity. Borrowing a narrative from the Mahabharata, the novelist develops it into a full length novel to point out the cracks in the political system of his time: as a political order, the Panchayat had lost the sense of justice within the first two decades after its promulgation in 1962. Dixit employs Galav and Madhavi as dissenting voice of the age, upholding the spirit of resistance and seeking for transformation in consciousness. The tale from the post-Vedic society serves as an instance to imply the parallel situation of the country that attempts to transcend beyond the contemporary context. In this study, I have approached the novel from the new historicist vantage point to dissect the text in the changing political context of its writing. The paper claims that as a Nepali novel, Dixit’s Madhavi rewrites the episode of political struggle between the person and polity in an oppressive political order in the 1970s in Nepal when the political self and polity were in tension as the outcome of their struggle for a new order in society. Moving beyond the existing situation, the maestro novelist picks the narrative of Madhavi and Galav from the Mahabharata and sets them in quest of new order in the form of agrarian society from the crumbling order of slavery. Dixit’s work critiques the limitations of both self and polity in leaving the impact of one on the other, thereby exposing the brutal treatment and fall of an oppressive political order. This paper reads historical reality of the 1970s in Dixit’s Madhavi in which the author writes the political history of Nepal.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/litstud.v35i01.43673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Madan Mani Dixit’s novel Madhavi (1983) subtly argues for change in the existing rigid political order of his time by projecting self larger than the polity. Borrowing a narrative from the Mahabharata, the novelist develops it into a full length novel to point out the cracks in the political system of his time: as a political order, the Panchayat had lost the sense of justice within the first two decades after its promulgation in 1962. Dixit employs Galav and Madhavi as dissenting voice of the age, upholding the spirit of resistance and seeking for transformation in consciousness. The tale from the post-Vedic society serves as an instance to imply the parallel situation of the country that attempts to transcend beyond the contemporary context. In this study, I have approached the novel from the new historicist vantage point to dissect the text in the changing political context of its writing. The paper claims that as a Nepali novel, Dixit’s Madhavi rewrites the episode of political struggle between the person and polity in an oppressive political order in the 1970s in Nepal when the political self and polity were in tension as the outcome of their struggle for a new order in society. Moving beyond the existing situation, the maestro novelist picks the narrative of Madhavi and Galav from the Mahabharata and sets them in quest of new order in the form of agrarian society from the crumbling order of slavery. Dixit’s work critiques the limitations of both self and polity in leaving the impact of one on the other, thereby exposing the brutal treatment and fall of an oppressive political order. This paper reads historical reality of the 1970s in Dixit’s Madhavi in which the author writes the political history of Nepal.
自我与政体:迪克西特《Madhavi》中的写作抵抗
Madan Mani Dixit的小说《Madhavi》(1983)巧妙地主张改变他那个时代现存的僵化的政治秩序,将自我置于政体之上。这位小说家借用《摩诃婆罗多》中的叙述,将其发展成一部长篇小说,以指出他那个时代政治制度的裂缝:作为一种政治秩序,村务委员会在1962年颁布后的头20年里失去了正义感。迪克西特将加拉夫和马德哈维作为时代的反对声音,坚持抵抗的精神,寻求意识的转变。后吠陀社会的故事作为一个例子,暗示了这个国家试图超越当代背景的平行情况。在这项研究中,我从新历史主义的角度来研究这部小说,在不断变化的政治语境中剖析这部小说。本文认为,作为一部尼泊尔小说,迪克西特的《Madhavi》重写了20世纪70年代尼泊尔在压迫性的政治秩序下,个人与政体之间的政治斗争情节,当时政治自我与政体处于紧张状态,这是他们为争取社会新秩序而斗争的结果。这位小说大师超越了现有的情况,从《摩诃婆罗多》中选取了马德哈维和加拉夫的叙述,让他们从摇摇欲倒的奴隶制秩序中寻求农业社会的新秩序。迪克西特的作品批评了自我和政体的局限性,因为它们将一方的影响留给了另一方,从而揭露了压迫性政治秩序的残酷对待和衰落。本文在迪克西特的《Madhavi》中阅读了20世纪70年代的历史现实,作者在书中写了尼泊尔的政治史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信