Save Rural Health Care: Time for a Significant Paradigm Shift

Brandon Isaacs
{"title":"Save Rural Health Care: Time for a Significant Paradigm Shift","authors":"Brandon Isaacs","doi":"10.7556/jaoa2019.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Submitted October 17, 2018; revision received January 31, 2019; accepted March 21, 2019. A ccess to health care in the rural United States is becoming increasingly difficult. Since 2005, 118 US rural hospitals have closed and almost 700 more are in danger of closing. 1 The decrease in access has resulted in detrimental health outcomes for people residing in rural communities. Recently, the University of North Carolina tracked United States rural hospital closures and gleaned results from 83 hospitals. The results identify 2 main factors for hospital closures: economics and lack of workforce. To remedy economic challenges facing rural hospitals, the Save Rural Hospitals Act/HR 2957 was proposed to Congress. However, the bill is not a sustainable solution for resolving economic challenges and the workforce shortage. Over time, we have seen dramatic reductions in lengths of stay, decreased census, and an exodus of health care professionals among other changes in the current rural hospital infrastructure. These changes have affected the osteopathic medical profession, particularly given our tendency to practice in primary care and rural settings. Osteopathic physicians tend to fill the primary care needs of rural communities at a rate 2.3 to 2.5 times higher than our allopathic colleagues. This article examines current challenges rural hospitals face and offers potential solutions to improve the rural health care delivery model. Implementation of multitiered solutions can improve access to necessary medical care and meet the rural population’s health care needs.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"551 - 555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa2019.098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Submitted October 17, 2018; revision received January 31, 2019; accepted March 21, 2019. A ccess to health care in the rural United States is becoming increasingly difficult. Since 2005, 118 US rural hospitals have closed and almost 700 more are in danger of closing. 1 The decrease in access has resulted in detrimental health outcomes for people residing in rural communities. Recently, the University of North Carolina tracked United States rural hospital closures and gleaned results from 83 hospitals. The results identify 2 main factors for hospital closures: economics and lack of workforce. To remedy economic challenges facing rural hospitals, the Save Rural Hospitals Act/HR 2957 was proposed to Congress. However, the bill is not a sustainable solution for resolving economic challenges and the workforce shortage. Over time, we have seen dramatic reductions in lengths of stay, decreased census, and an exodus of health care professionals among other changes in the current rural hospital infrastructure. These changes have affected the osteopathic medical profession, particularly given our tendency to practice in primary care and rural settings. Osteopathic physicians tend to fill the primary care needs of rural communities at a rate 2.3 to 2.5 times higher than our allopathic colleagues. This article examines current challenges rural hospitals face and offers potential solutions to improve the rural health care delivery model. Implementation of multitiered solutions can improve access to necessary medical care and meet the rural population’s health care needs.
拯救农村卫生保健:是时候进行重大的模式转变了
2018年10月17日提交;修订于2019年1月31日收到;2019年3月21日录用。在美国农村获得医疗保健越来越困难。自2005年以来,美国已有118家乡村医院关闭,还有近700家面临关闭的危险。1 .获取机会的减少对居住在农村社区的人造成了有害的健康后果。最近,北卡罗来纳大学追踪了美国农村医院关闭的情况,并收集了83家医院的结果。结果确定了医院关闭的两个主要因素:经济和缺乏劳动力。为了解决农村医院面临的经济挑战,向国会提出了《拯救农村医院法》/HR 2957。然而,该法案并不是解决经济挑战和劳动力短缺的可持续解决方案。随着时间的推移,我们看到住院时间大幅缩短,人口普查减少,医疗保健专业人员外流,以及当前农村医院基础设施的其他变化。这些变化已经影响了整骨疗法医学专业,特别是考虑到我们在初级保健和农村环境中实践的趋势。整骨疗法医生满足农村社区初级保健需求的比率是对抗疗法医生的2.3到2.5倍。本文探讨了当前农村医院面临的挑战,并提供了改善农村医疗服务模式的潜在解决方案。实施多层次解决方案可以改善获得必要医疗保健的机会,满足农村人口的保健需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信