COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: A CASE STUDY OF CHINA

IF 4.8 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Technological and Economic Development of Economy Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI:10.3846/tede.2022.17125

Zhen Shi, Yingju Wu, Yung‐ho Chiu, Changfeng Shi, Xiaohong Na

{"title":"COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: A CASE STUDY OF CHINA","authors":"Zhen Shi, Yingju Wu, Yung‐ho Chiu, Changfeng Shi, Xiaohong Na","doi":"10.3846/tede.2022.17125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The combination of knowledge innovation and technology innovation provides vitality for social science and technology innovation. China leaps into the front ranks of the world in the 2021 Global Innovation Index (GII). Therefore, this research takes China's theoretical-application innovation as the research object and empirically analyzes measure the innovation efficiency of knowledge innovation dominated by universities and technological innovation dominated by enterprises in China, as well as the gravity-center migration trajectory. The results show that the ranking of overall efficiency of theoretical innovation-application innovation is eastern region > central region > western region. Knowledge innovation presents a drag on overall efficiency, while technology innovation offers a contribution to overall efficiency. In the analysis of PIE (R&D personnel of industrial enterprises above a designated size) variables, the efficiency value is relatively low. The peak value of kernel density increases in the eastern, central and western regions, namely the concentration degree of theoretical innovation-application innovation efficiency in China has risen. The gravity center of each stage migrates to the eastern region, meaning the efficiency value of China’s theoretical innovation and application innovation increases more significantly in the eastern region. From the perspective of knowledge innovation and technology innovation, this paper puts forward suggestions for China and provides some references for other developing countries.","PeriodicalId":51460,"journal":{"name":"Technological and Economic Development of Economy","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological and Economic Development of Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

The combination of knowledge innovation and technology innovation provides vitality for social science and technology innovation. China leaps into the front ranks of the world in the 2021 Global Innovation Index (GII). Therefore, this research takes China's theoretical-application innovation as the research object and empirically analyzes measure the innovation efficiency of knowledge innovation dominated by universities and technological innovation dominated by enterprises in China, as well as the gravity-center migration trajectory. The results show that the ranking of overall efficiency of theoretical innovation-application innovation is eastern region > central region > western region. Knowledge innovation presents a drag on overall efficiency, while technology innovation offers a contribution to overall efficiency. In the analysis of PIE (R&D personnel of industrial enterprises above a designated size) variables, the efficiency value is relatively low. The peak value of kernel density increases in the eastern, central and western regions, namely the concentration degree of theoretical innovation-application innovation efficiency in China has risen. The gravity center of each stage migrates to the eastern region, meaning the efficiency value of China’s theoretical innovation and application innovation increases more significantly in the eastern region. From the perspective of knowledge innovation and technology innovation, this paper puts forward suggestions for China and provides some references for other developing countries.

查看原文本刊更多论文

区域知识创新与技术创新效率比较——以中国为例

知识创新与技术创新的结合为社会科技创新提供了活力。在2021年全球创新指数(GII)中，中国跃居世界前列。因此，本研究以中国的理论-应用创新为研究对象，实证分析了衡量中国以大学为主导的知识创新和以企业为主导的技术创新的创新效率及其重心迁移轨迹。结果表明:理论创新-应用创新综合效率排序为东部地区b>，中部地区b>，西部地区b>;知识创新对整体效率有拖累，而技术创新对整体效率有贡献。在PIE(规模以上工业企业研发人员)变量分析中，效率值相对较低。核密度的峰值在东、中、西部地区呈上升趋势，即理论创新-应用创新效率的集中度上升。各阶段的重心都向东部地区迁移，即中国理论创新和应用创新的效率值在东部地区增长更为显著。本文从知识创新和技术创新的角度对中国提出了建议，并为其他发展中国家提供了一些参考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Technological and Economic Development of Economy ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

10.00

自引率

8.50%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： Technological and Economic Development of Economy is a refereed journal that publishes original research and review articles and book reviews. The Journal is designed for publishing articles in the following fields of research: systems for sustainable development, policy on sustainable development, legislation on sustainable development, strategies, approaches and methods for sustainable development, visions and scenarios for the future, education for sustainable development, institutional change and sustainable development, health care and sustainable development, alternative economic paradigms for sustainable development, partnership in the field of sustainable development, industry and sustainable development, sustainable development challenges to business and management, technological changes and sustainable development, social aspects of sustainability, economic dimensions of sustainability, political dimensions of sustainability, innovations, life cycle design and assessment, ethics and sustainability, sustainable design and material selection, assessment of environmental impact, ecology and sustainability, application case studies, best practices, decision making theory, models of operations research, theory and practice of operations research, statistics, optimization, simulation. All papers to be published in Technological and Economic Development of Economy are peer reviewed by two appointed experts. The Journal is published quarterly, in March, June, September and December.