Natural resources-sustainable environment conflicts amidst COP26 resolutions: investigating the role of renewable energy, technology innovations, green finance, and structural change

IF 6.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
R. Ibrahim, Y. Huang, A. Mohammed, T. Adebayo
{"title":"Natural resources-sustainable environment conflicts amidst COP26 resolutions: investigating the role of renewable energy, technology innovations, green finance, and structural change","authors":"R. Ibrahim, Y. Huang, A. Mohammed, T. Adebayo","doi":"10.1080/13504509.2022.2162147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Today, the world is encountering one of the most challenging moments in history due to the surging levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions linked to many factors, with natural resources standing out. The recent COP26 extensively echoes the need for a conscious exploration of natural resources in a bid to sustain the ecosystem for the present and future generations. To this end, the current research probes the impacts of natural resources vectoring oil, coal, and gases, on CO2 emissions in selected 10 top natural resource-dependent countries from 1995 to 2019. Additionally, the model considers the pertinent role of renewable energy, green finance, structural change, and technology advancement. The empirical evidence relies on preliminary tests comprising cross-sectional interdependence tests, homogeneity tests, stationarity tests, and cointegration tests that account for the issue of cross-sectional dependence in the panel model, all of which conform to the expected rule of thumb. Besides, second-generation estimators such as CS-ARDL, CCEMG, AMG, and the novel quantile regression, are employed to evaluate the empirical model. The results show that natural resources exacerbate CO2 emission surge. However, moderating impacts are evident from renewable energy, structural change, green finance, and technology. The heterogeneous effects which emanate from quantile regression indicate that the main results are robust. Consequently, cutting down fossil fuels subsidies and increasing investment in renewable energy constitute key recommendations advanced by this study.","PeriodicalId":50287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology","volume":"14 1","pages":"445 - 457"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2162147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

ABSTRACT Today, the world is encountering one of the most challenging moments in history due to the surging levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions linked to many factors, with natural resources standing out. The recent COP26 extensively echoes the need for a conscious exploration of natural resources in a bid to sustain the ecosystem for the present and future generations. To this end, the current research probes the impacts of natural resources vectoring oil, coal, and gases, on CO2 emissions in selected 10 top natural resource-dependent countries from 1995 to 2019. Additionally, the model considers the pertinent role of renewable energy, green finance, structural change, and technology advancement. The empirical evidence relies on preliminary tests comprising cross-sectional interdependence tests, homogeneity tests, stationarity tests, and cointegration tests that account for the issue of cross-sectional dependence in the panel model, all of which conform to the expected rule of thumb. Besides, second-generation estimators such as CS-ARDL, CCEMG, AMG, and the novel quantile regression, are employed to evaluate the empirical model. The results show that natural resources exacerbate CO2 emission surge. However, moderating impacts are evident from renewable energy, structural change, green finance, and technology. The heterogeneous effects which emanate from quantile regression indicate that the main results are robust. Consequently, cutting down fossil fuels subsidies and increasing investment in renewable energy constitute key recommendations advanced by this study.
COP26决议中的自然资源与可持续环境冲突:研究可再生能源、技术创新、绿色金融和结构变革的作用
当今世界正面临着历史上最具挑战性的时刻之一,温室气体(GHG)排放水平的飙升与许多因素有关,其中自然资源问题尤为突出。最近召开的联合国气候变化框架公约第26次缔约方会议广泛重申,有必要有意识地勘探自然资源,以便为今世后代维持生态系统。为此,本研究选取了1995年至2019年10个自然资源依赖度最高的国家,探讨了以石油、煤炭和天然气为载体的自然资源对二氧化碳排放的影响。此外,该模型还考虑了可再生能源、绿色金融、结构变化和技术进步的相关作用。经验证据依赖于初步测试,包括横截面相互依赖测试、同质性测试、平稳性测试和协整测试,这些测试说明了面板模型中的横截面依赖问题,所有这些都符合预期的经验法则。此外,还采用了CS-ARDL、CCEMG、AMG等第二代估计量和新型分位数回归对实证模型进行了评价。结果表明,自然资源加剧了CO2排放的激增。然而,可再生能源、结构变化、绿色金融和技术的影响明显减弱。分位数回归产生的异质性效应表明,主要结果是稳健的。因此,削减化石燃料补贴和增加可再生能源投资是本研究提出的主要建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
58
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology is now over fifteen years old and has proved to be an exciting forum for understanding and advancing our knowledge and implementation of sustainable development. Sustainable development is now of primary importance as the key to future use and management of finite world resources. It recognises the need for development opportunities while maintaining a balance between these and the environment. As stated by the UN Bruntland Commission in 1987, sustainable development should "meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信