Visibility in the digital age: Introduction

Q3 Social Sciences
C. Brantner, Helena Stehle
{"title":"Visibility in the digital age: Introduction","authors":"C. Brantner, Helena Stehle","doi":"10.24434/J.SCOMS.2021.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the digital age, calls for transparency and openness as well as for privacy and confidentiality prevail: Struggles for visibility occur simultaneously with conflicts regarding invisibility and hidden battles for power and privileges of interpretation. Concerns about a loss of digital self-determination exist, just like those regarding the “right to be forgotten” or the right to become invisible and unseen. While the idea of a “transparent user” – as the ultimate notion of (in)voluntary visibility – has caused a broad outcry in society and in scientific debates a few years ago (Palfrey & Gasser, 2008), the discussion has shifted toward considerations of Internet governance and regulation (Camenisch, Fischer-Hubner, & Hansen, 2015). Brighenti (2010, p. 109) has pointed out that visibility has long been one of the key aspects “associated with the public sphere” and that in today’s digitized publics, the “project of democracy can no longer be imagined without taking into account visibility and its outcomes” (Brighenti, 2010, p. 189). Visibility and invisibility, along with their societal outcomes, are increasingly being discussed and analyzed, as they are becoming important dimensions in the accurate description and explanation of digital communication.","PeriodicalId":38434,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Communication Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"93–98-93–98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Communication Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24434/J.SCOMS.2021.01.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the digital age, calls for transparency and openness as well as for privacy and confidentiality prevail: Struggles for visibility occur simultaneously with conflicts regarding invisibility and hidden battles for power and privileges of interpretation. Concerns about a loss of digital self-determination exist, just like those regarding the “right to be forgotten” or the right to become invisible and unseen. While the idea of a “transparent user” – as the ultimate notion of (in)voluntary visibility – has caused a broad outcry in society and in scientific debates a few years ago (Palfrey & Gasser, 2008), the discussion has shifted toward considerations of Internet governance and regulation (Camenisch, Fischer-Hubner, & Hansen, 2015). Brighenti (2010, p. 109) has pointed out that visibility has long been one of the key aspects “associated with the public sphere” and that in today’s digitized publics, the “project of democracy can no longer be imagined without taking into account visibility and its outcomes” (Brighenti, 2010, p. 189). Visibility and invisibility, along with their societal outcomes, are increasingly being discussed and analyzed, as they are becoming important dimensions in the accurate description and explanation of digital communication.
数字时代的可视性:导论
在数字时代,要求透明和开放以及隐私和保密的呼声普遍存在:对可见性的斗争与对不可见性的冲突以及对权力和解释特权的隐性斗争同时发生。就像“被遗忘的权利”或“被忽视和被忽视的权利”一样,对数字自决丧失的担忧也存在。虽然“透明用户”的概念——作为自愿可见性的最终概念——几年前在社会和科学辩论中引起了广泛的强烈抗议(Palfrey & Gasser, 2008),但讨论已经转向了对互联网治理和监管的考虑(Camenisch, Fischer-Hubner, & Hansen, 2015)。brigenti(2010,第109页)指出,可见性长期以来一直是“与公共领域相关”的关键方面之一,在今天的数字化公众中,“如果不考虑可见性及其结果,民主项目就无法想象”(Brighenti, 2010,第189页)。可见性和不可见性,以及它们的社会结果,越来越多地被讨论和分析,因为它们正在成为准确描述和解释数字通信的重要维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Communication Sciences
Studies in Communication Sciences Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信