PENGARUH TEKANAN KETAATAN, KOMPLEKSITAS TUGAS, PENGALAMAN, DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP AUDIT JUDGMENT, GENDER SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING

Noor Jannah, A. Yuniarto
{"title":"PENGARUH TEKANAN KETAATAN, KOMPLEKSITAS TUGAS, PENGALAMAN, DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP AUDIT JUDGMENT, GENDER SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING","authors":"Noor Jannah, A. Yuniarto","doi":"10.12928/J.REKSA.V2I2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research has a purpose to understand and to analyze the influence of obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation for audit judgment with gender as moderating variable. From this research, it is able to get empirical evidence about the influence of obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation for audit judgment. Besides, this research also gives empirical evidence about the difference between man and woman in deciding audit judgment whether it correlates with several factor such as obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation. In this research, the researcher uses sample for auditors which is serve in the Public Accountant Office in DIY and Semarang. In this research, primary data is used as data, while General Linear Model (GLM) with helping IBM SPSS version 19.0 is used as analysis instrument. The result of this research is to indicate that task complexity influence for audit judgment, while obedient pressure, experience, and motivation do not influence for audit judgment. The issue about gender difference do not also moderate the influence of obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation for audit judgment.","PeriodicalId":34792,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Reksa","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Reksa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/J.REKSA.V2I2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research has a purpose to understand and to analyze the influence of obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation for audit judgment with gender as moderating variable. From this research, it is able to get empirical evidence about the influence of obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation for audit judgment. Besides, this research also gives empirical evidence about the difference between man and woman in deciding audit judgment whether it correlates with several factor such as obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation. In this research, the researcher uses sample for auditors which is serve in the Public Accountant Office in DIY and Semarang. In this research, primary data is used as data, while General Linear Model (GLM) with helping IBM SPSS version 19.0 is used as analysis instrument. The result of this research is to indicate that task complexity influence for audit judgment, while obedient pressure, experience, and motivation do not influence for audit judgment. The issue about gender difference do not also moderate the influence of obedient pressure, task complexity, experience, and motivation for audit judgment.
服从压力、任务复杂性、经验和动机对评估评估、性别作为可变变量的影响
本研究旨在了解和分析服从压力、任务复杂性、经验和动机对审计判断的影响,并以性别为调节变量。通过本研究,可以得到服从压力、任务复杂性、经验和动机对审计判断影响的实证证据。此外,本研究还提供了男性和女性在决定审计判断方面的差异,是否与服从压力、任务复杂性、经验和动机等几个因素相关。在本研究中,研究者以在DIY和三宝垄的会计师事务所服务的审计师为样本。本研究采用原始数据作为数据,采用通用线性模型(General Linear Model, GLM)辅助IBM SPSS version 19.0作为分析工具。本研究结果表明,任务复杂性对审计判断有影响,而服从压力、经验和动机对审计判断没有影响。性别差异对服从压力、任务复杂性、经验和审计判断动机的影响也没有调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信