A 0–1 mixed‐integer program‐based group‐and‐release strategy for solving the integrated runway scheduling and taxiway routing problem

J. Desai, S. Srivathsan, Chuhang Yu, Dong Zhang
{"title":"A 0–1 mixed‐integer program‐based group‐and‐release strategy for solving the integrated runway scheduling and taxiway routing problem","authors":"J. Desai, S. Srivathsan, Chuhang Yu, Dong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nav.22072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With growing air traffic demand and the required airport infrastructure lagging behind by at least a decade, it has become imperative for air traffic controllers to efficiently squeeze the available capacity at an airport in order to minimize aircraft delays. It has been well documented that the two major bottlenecks affecting the smooth functioning of air traffic operations at an airport are runways and taxiways. The key problem involving these resources includes the scheduling of flights on the runway, and the determination of the taxiway paths to be traversed by flights from their assigned gates to the runway. We address this problem by modeling an integrated runway scheduling and taxiway routing problem as a 0–1 mixed‐integer program (MIP) in a free‐path setting where any feasible taxiway route can potentially be assigned to a flight. As a direct application of this MIP model is not suitable for solving large‐scale instances, we develop a three‐step group‐and‐release strategy that first segregates the flights based on their allocated gates and associated ramps, and then solves the MIP model for each ramp to determine the taxiway path for each flight. In the final step, the path for each flight is fixed, and a sequencing problem over all flights is solved to determine high quality, feasible solutions. The performance of the proposed methodology is benchmarked against three algorithms, namely: (i) constraint‐generation; (ii) sequential two‐stage algorithm; and (iii) FCFS algorithm. Our numerical experiments, based on actual flight data from Changi airport (Singapore), show that, on average, the optimality gap as well as the computational time is considerably reduced for our strategy as compared to existing methods, thereby highlighting the efficacy of the proposed approach in solving realistic instances.","PeriodicalId":19120,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","volume":"99 1","pages":"939 - 957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With growing air traffic demand and the required airport infrastructure lagging behind by at least a decade, it has become imperative for air traffic controllers to efficiently squeeze the available capacity at an airport in order to minimize aircraft delays. It has been well documented that the two major bottlenecks affecting the smooth functioning of air traffic operations at an airport are runways and taxiways. The key problem involving these resources includes the scheduling of flights on the runway, and the determination of the taxiway paths to be traversed by flights from their assigned gates to the runway. We address this problem by modeling an integrated runway scheduling and taxiway routing problem as a 0–1 mixed‐integer program (MIP) in a free‐path setting where any feasible taxiway route can potentially be assigned to a flight. As a direct application of this MIP model is not suitable for solving large‐scale instances, we develop a three‐step group‐and‐release strategy that first segregates the flights based on their allocated gates and associated ramps, and then solves the MIP model for each ramp to determine the taxiway path for each flight. In the final step, the path for each flight is fixed, and a sequencing problem over all flights is solved to determine high quality, feasible solutions. The performance of the proposed methodology is benchmarked against three algorithms, namely: (i) constraint‐generation; (ii) sequential two‐stage algorithm; and (iii) FCFS algorithm. Our numerical experiments, based on actual flight data from Changi airport (Singapore), show that, on average, the optimality gap as well as the computational time is considerably reduced for our strategy as compared to existing methods, thereby highlighting the efficacy of the proposed approach in solving realistic instances.
一种基于0-1混合整数规划的组合释放策略,用于解决综合跑道调度和滑行道路由问题
随着空中交通需求的增长和所需的机场基础设施落后至少十年,空中交通管制员必须有效地挤压机场的可用容量,以尽量减少飞机延误。有大量资料表明,影响机场空中交通运作顺利进行的两个主要瓶颈是跑道和滑行道。涉及这些资源的关键问题包括跑道上航班的调度,以及确定从指定登机口到跑道的航班要经过的滑行道路径。我们将一个综合的跑道调度和滑行道路线问题建模为自由路径设置中的0-1混合整数规划(MIP),其中任何可行的滑行道路线都可以分配给航班。由于该MIP模型的直接应用不适合解决大规模实例,我们开发了一个三步分组和释放策略,首先根据分配的登机口和相关坡道隔离航班,然后求解每个坡道的MIP模型,以确定每个航班的滑行道路径。在最后一步中,每个航班的路径是固定的,并解决所有航班的排序问题,以确定高质量,可行的解决方案。所提出的方法的性能是针对三种算法进行基准测试的,即:(i)约束生成;(ii)顺序两阶段算法;(iii) FCFS算法。我们基于新加坡樟宜机场的实际飞行数据进行的数值实验表明,与现有方法相比,我们的策略的平均最优性差距和计算时间大大减少,从而突出了所提出方法在解决实际实例方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信