How do transitions affect the wave overtopping flow locally as well as downstream?

Vera M. van Bergeijk, J. Warmink, S. Hulscher
{"title":"How do transitions affect the wave overtopping flow locally as well as downstream?","authors":"Vera M. van Bergeijk, J. Warmink, S. Hulscher","doi":"10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wave overtopping on grass-covered dikes results in erosion of the dike cover. Once the dike cover is eroded, the core will be washed away and the dike breaches, leading to flooding of the hinterland. Transitions between grass covers and revetments or geometric transitions are vulnerable for cover erosion and are therefore the most likely locations to initiate dike breach. These transitions affect the overtopping flow and thereby the hydraulic load on the dike cover. For example, bed roughness differences can create additional turbulence and slope changes can result in the formation of a jet that increases the load at the jet impact location. Although it is known that dike cover failure often starts at transitions, the effect of transitions on the hydraulic load remains unknown.</p><p>We developed a detailed numerical 2DV model in OpenFOAM for the overtopping flow over the crest and the landward slope of a grass-covered dike. This model is used to study the effects of transitions on the overtopping flow variables including the flow velocity, shear stress, normal stress and pressure. Several types of transitions are studied such as revetment transitions, slope changes and height differences.&#160;</p><p>The results show that the shear stress, normal stress and pressure increase significantly at geometric transitions such as the transition from the crest to the slope and at the landward toe. The increase depends on the wave volume and the geometry of the dike such as the steepness and length of the landward slope. Furthermore, the results show that roughness changes at revetment transition on a grass-covered crest has no influence on the maximum shear stress, maximum normal stress and maximum pressure. The flow velocity increases from a rough to a smooth revetment, while the opposite occurs for the transition from a smooth to a rough revetment. The variation in the flow velocity is well described by analytical formulas for the maximum flow velocity along the dike profile. These formulas are also able to describe the variation in flow velocity for a revetment transition on a berm on the landward slope. In this case, the shear stress increases from a smooth to a rough revetment and decreases from a rough to a smooth revetment. This means that a rough revetment can locally reduce the shear stress, however the transitions have no effect on the shear stress downstream.</p><p>These model results are used to obtain relations for the increase in the hydraulic variables at transitions. These relations can be used to describe the effect of transitions on the hydraulic load in models for grass cover failure by overtopping waves. Accurate descriptions of the hydraulic load in these models will improve the failure assessment of grass-covered dikes with transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22413,"journal":{"name":"The EGU General Assembly","volume":"110 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EGU General Assembly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wave overtopping on grass-covered dikes results in erosion of the dike cover. Once the dike cover is eroded, the core will be washed away and the dike breaches, leading to flooding of the hinterland. Transitions between grass covers and revetments or geometric transitions are vulnerable for cover erosion and are therefore the most likely locations to initiate dike breach. These transitions affect the overtopping flow and thereby the hydraulic load on the dike cover. For example, bed roughness differences can create additional turbulence and slope changes can result in the formation of a jet that increases the load at the jet impact location. Although it is known that dike cover failure often starts at transitions, the effect of transitions on the hydraulic load remains unknown.

We developed a detailed numerical 2DV model in OpenFOAM for the overtopping flow over the crest and the landward slope of a grass-covered dike. This model is used to study the effects of transitions on the overtopping flow variables including the flow velocity, shear stress, normal stress and pressure. Several types of transitions are studied such as revetment transitions, slope changes and height differences. 

The results show that the shear stress, normal stress and pressure increase significantly at geometric transitions such as the transition from the crest to the slope and at the landward toe. The increase depends on the wave volume and the geometry of the dike such as the steepness and length of the landward slope. Furthermore, the results show that roughness changes at revetment transition on a grass-covered crest has no influence on the maximum shear stress, maximum normal stress and maximum pressure. The flow velocity increases from a rough to a smooth revetment, while the opposite occurs for the transition from a smooth to a rough revetment. The variation in the flow velocity is well described by analytical formulas for the maximum flow velocity along the dike profile. These formulas are also able to describe the variation in flow velocity for a revetment transition on a berm on the landward slope. In this case, the shear stress increases from a smooth to a rough revetment and decreases from a rough to a smooth revetment. This means that a rough revetment can locally reduce the shear stress, however the transitions have no effect on the shear stress downstream.

These model results are used to obtain relations for the increase in the hydraulic variables at transitions. These relations can be used to describe the effect of transitions on the hydraulic load in models for grass cover failure by overtopping waves. Accurate descriptions of the hydraulic load in these models will improve the failure assessment of grass-covered dikes with transitions.

过渡如何影响局部和下游的波浪过顶流?
波浪对草覆盖堤防的漫过造成堤防覆盖层的侵蚀。一旦堤坝被侵蚀,核心部分将被冲走,堤坝决口,导致内陆地区洪水泛滥。草地覆盖物和护岸之间的过渡或几何过渡容易受到覆盖物侵蚀,因此是最可能引发堤防决口的位置。这些过渡会影响溢流,从而影响堤盖上的水力负荷。例如,床层粗糙度的差异会产生额外的湍流,坡度的变化会导致射流的形成,从而增加射流撞击位置的载荷。虽然已知堤盖破坏通常始于过渡,但过渡对水力荷载的影响尚不清楚。我们在OpenFOAM中开发了一个详细的数值2DV模型,用于覆盖草堤的波峰和陆地斜坡上的溢水流。利用该模型研究了过渡对溢流速度、剪切应力、法向应力和压力等流动变量的影响。研究了护坡过渡、坡度变化和高差等几种类型的过渡。结果表明,在波峰向坡度过渡和向地趾过渡等几何过渡处,剪应力、正应力和压力显著增加。增加的幅度取决于波浪的体积和堤防的几何形状,如向陆地倾斜的陡度和长度。结果表明,草坡护岸过渡时的粗糙度变化对最大剪应力、最大正应力和最大压力没有影响。从粗糙的护岸到光滑的护岸流速增大,而从光滑的护岸到粗糙的护岸流速则相反。沿堤防剖面的最大流速解析公式很好地描述了流速的变化。这些公式也可以用来描述向陆坡上护岸过渡时的流速变化。在这种情况下,从光滑护岸到粗糙护岸剪应力增加,从粗糙护岸到光滑护岸剪应力减小。这意味着粗糙的护岸可以局部降低剪应力,但这种转变对下游的剪应力没有影响。这些模型结果用于获得过渡时水力变量的增加关系。这些关系可用于描述过顶波破坏模型中过渡对水力荷载的影响。这些模型中对水力荷载的准确描述,将提高对草堤过渡破坏的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信