Adapt or Die? Resilience Discourse and the Shifting Contours of Humanitarian Morality

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Malay Firoz
{"title":"Adapt or Die? Resilience Discourse and the Shifting Contours of Humanitarian Morality","authors":"Malay Firoz","doi":"10.17230/co-herencia.19.36.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The epistemic terrain of humanitarian morality hasundergone a profound paradigmatic transformationin recent years. The turn towards “resilience” as a structuring principle in aid programmes has produced new modes of governance that challenge what I call the moral exceptionalism of humanitarianism’s mandate. This article traces the trajectory of moralism in humanitarian studies, exploring how the productive tension between  contrapuntal readings of humanitarianism as moral intent or biopolitical care is transcended by the resilience paradigm’s ontological vision of an intrinsically fragileand vulnerable world. Contrary to theoretical critiques of resilience as an extension of neoliberal tenets to global governance, I draw on the context of the Syrian refugee crisis in Jordan to argue that resilience humanitarianism has in fact prompted a return to state welfare as the final guarantor of refugee rights. ","PeriodicalId":41856,"journal":{"name":"Co-herencia","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Co-herencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.19.36.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The epistemic terrain of humanitarian morality hasundergone a profound paradigmatic transformationin recent years. The turn towards “resilience” as a structuring principle in aid programmes has produced new modes of governance that challenge what I call the moral exceptionalism of humanitarianism’s mandate. This article traces the trajectory of moralism in humanitarian studies, exploring how the productive tension between  contrapuntal readings of humanitarianism as moral intent or biopolitical care is transcended by the resilience paradigm’s ontological vision of an intrinsically fragileand vulnerable world. Contrary to theoretical critiques of resilience as an extension of neoliberal tenets to global governance, I draw on the context of the Syrian refugee crisis in Jordan to argue that resilience humanitarianism has in fact prompted a return to state welfare as the final guarantor of refugee rights. 
适应还是死亡?弹性话语与人道主义道德的变化轮廓
近年来,人道主义道德的认知领域发生了深刻的范式转变。把“弹性”作为援助项目的结构原则,产生了新的治理模式,挑战了我所说的人道主义使命的道德例外主义。本文追溯了人道主义研究中道德主义的轨迹,探讨了将人道主义作为道德意图或生命政治关怀的对位解读之间的生产张力如何被弹性范式对本质上脆弱和脆弱的世界的本体论观点所超越。与将弹性作为新自由主义原则延伸到全球治理的理论批评相反,我借鉴了约旦叙利亚难民危机的背景,认为弹性人道主义实际上促使了国家福利作为难民权利的最终保障的回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Co-herencia
Co-herencia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信